Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34174881›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2021

Enhancing student nurses' clinical education in aged care homes: a qualitative study of challenges perceived by faculty staff.

Kristin Laugaland, Stephen Billett, Kristin Akerjordet, Christina Frøiland, Laurie Grealish, Ingunn Aase

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Kristin LaugalandSHARE- Centre for Resilience in Healthcare, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, Kjell Arholms gate 41, 4036, Stavanger, Norway. kristin.a.laugaland@uis.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3451-2584
Stephen BillettEducation and Professional Studies, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9926-3518
Kristin AkerjordetSHARE- Centre for Resilience in Healthcare, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, Kjell Arholms gate 41, 4036, Stavanger, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4300-4496
Christina FrøilandSHARE- Centre for Resilience in Healthcare, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, Kjell Arholms gate 41, 4036, Stavanger, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3902-8022
Laurie GrealishMenzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University and Gold Coast Health, Gold Coast, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0699-2886
Ingunn AaseSHARE- Centre for Resilience in Healthcare, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, Kjell Arholms gate 41, 4036, Stavanger, Norway.
University of Stavanger · NOGriffith University · AU

Funding

Norges Forskningsråd 273558
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAgeing populations are increasing the demand for geriatric care services. As nursing schools respond to this demand, more high-quality clinical placements are required, and aged care homes offer suitable placement sites. Although an aged care experience for students is beneficial, the basis for effective implementation of these placements is yet to be fully established. The aim of this study was to explore faculty staff perspectives on the challenges associated with providing effective clinical education in aged care homes for first-year student nurses.

methodsAn exploratory qualitative study was performed. Fifteen in-depth interviews were conducted with program leaders of nursing degree programs (n = 4), course leaders (n = 6) and practice coordinators (n = 5) in three Norwegian universities. Data were analysed using thematic analysis. The findings were reported using the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (SRQR).

resultsFive themes were identified regarding the perceived challenges to implementing effective clinical education in aged care homes: (1) low staffing levels of registered nurses limit the capacity to effectively host students; (2) prevalence of part-time teachers can compromise the quality of students' learning experiences; (3) tensions about the required qualifications and competencies of nurse teachers; (4) variation in learning assessments; and (5) lack of quality assurance.

conclusionsThese challenges signal key areas to be addressed in quality assurance for effective aged care placements. Further research into the minimum staffing levels required to support student learning in the aged care setting is required. Methods for developing shared practices to facilitate learning in aged care homes need to address the prevalence of part-time teaching appointments. Further research into the levels of qualification and competence required to support student learning in aged care facilities can assist with setting standards for this sector. Finally, academic-practice institutions must engage with government officials and national nursing bodies to develop national standards for clinical education in aged care homes.

Indexed as

Aged care home placementsChallengesClinical educationExperiencesFaculty staffFirst-year student nursesPerceptions

Identifiers

PMID34174881
PMCPMC8235807
OpenAlexW3175180934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.