Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34174856›Full record

ArticleBMC palliative care2021

NUrsing Homes End of Life care Program (NUHELP): developing a complex intervention.

Emilio Mota-Romero, Ana Alejandra Esteban-Burgos, Daniel Puente-Fernández, María Paz García-Caro, Cesar Hueso-Montoro, Raquel Mercedes Herrero-Hahn, Rafael Montoya-Juárez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC palliative care, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Emilio Mota-RomeroSalvador Caballero Primary Care Centre, Andalusian Health Service, Granada, Spain.
Ana Alejandra Esteban-BurgosDepartment of Nursing, Doctoral Program in Clinical Medicine and Public Health, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Daniel Puente-FernándezDoctoral Program in Clinical Medicine and Public Health, University of Granada, Granada, Spain. danielpuentefdz@correo.ugr.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4917-9078
María Paz García-CaroDepartment of Nursing, Brain and Behaviour Research Institute, University of Granada, Mind, Spain.
Cesar Hueso-MontoroDepartment of Nursing, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Raquel Mercedes Herrero-HahnUniversity Health Provider Institution, University of Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia.
Rafael Montoya-JuárezDepartment of Nursing, Brain and Behaviour Research Institute, University of Granada, Mind, Spain.

Funding

Consejería de Salud, Junta de Andalucía AP-0105-2016
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNursing homes are likely to become increasingly important as end-of-life care facilities. Previous studies indicate that individuals residing in these facilities have a high prevalence of end-of-life symptoms and a significant need for palliative care. The aim of this study was to develop an end-of-life care program for nursing homes in Spain based on previous models yet adapted to the specific context and the needs of staff in nursing homes in the country.

methodsA descriptive study of a complex intervention procedure was developed. The study consisted of three phases. The first phase was a prospective study assessing self-efficacy in palliative care (using the SEPC scale) and attitudes towards end-of-life care (using the FATCOD-B scale) among nursing home staff before and after the completion of a basic palliative care training program. In the second phase, objectives were selected using the Delphi consensus technique, where nursing home and primary care professionals assessed the relevance, feasibility, and level of attainment of 42 quality standards. In phase 3, interventions were selected for these objectives through two focus group sessions involving nursing home, primary care, and palliative care professionals.

resultsAs a result of the training, an improvement in self-efficacy and attitudes towards end-of-life care was observed. In phase 2, 14 standards were selected and grouped into 5 objectives: to conduct a comprehensive assessment and develop a personalized care plan adapted to the palliative needs detected; to provide information in a clear and accessible way; to request and record advance care directives; to provide early care with respect to loss and grief; to refer patients to a specialized palliative care unit if appropriate, depending on the complexity of the palliative care required. Based on these objectives, the participants in the focus group sessions designed the 22 interventions that make up the program.

conclusionsThe objectives and interventions of the NUHELP program constitute an end-of-life care program which can be implemented in nursing homes to improve the quality of end-of-life care in these facilities by modifying their clinical practice, organization, and relationship with the health system as well as serving as an example of an effective health intervention program.

Indexed as

Nursing StaffTerminal CareHumansNursing HomesPalliative CareProspective StudiesEnd of LifeHolistic CareNurse-Patient interactionNurse-Patient RelationshipsNursing Home CareOlder PeoplePalliative Care

Identifiers

PMID34174856
PMCPMC8234765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.