Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34174835›Full record

ArticleBMC microbiology2021

A newly identified linear epitope on non-RBD region of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein improves the serological detection rate of COVID-19 patients.

Yunwen Zhang, Zhengrong Yang, Sicheng Tian, Baisheng Li, Tiejian Feng, Jianfan He, Min Jiang, Xiujuan Tang, Shujiang Mei, Hao Li and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Characterization of the antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 in a mildly affected pediatric population.Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Role of Peptides in Diagnostics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yunwen Zhang *West China School of Public Health and West China Fourth Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, PR China.
Zhengrong Yang *Shenzhen Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shenzhen, China.
Sicheng Tian *West China School of Public Health and West China Fourth Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, PR China.
Baisheng Li *Guangdong Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Guangdong, China.
Tiejian FengShenzhen Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shenzhen, China.
Jianfan HeShenzhen Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shenzhen, China.
Min JiangShenzhen Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shenzhen, China.
Xiujuan TangShenzhen Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shenzhen, China.
Shujiang MeiShenzhen Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shenzhen, China.
Hao LiShenzhen Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shenzhen, China.
Yifan ZhongShenzhen Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shenzhen, China.
Guilian LiShenzhen Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shenzhen, China.
Mingyuan TangWest China School of Public Health and West China Fourth Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, PR China.
Sijing LiuWest China School of Public Health and West China Fourth Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, PR China.
Tian TangWest China School of Public Health and West China Fourth Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, PR China.
Chuan WangWest China School of Public Health and West China Fourth Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, PR China. wangchuan@scu.edu.cn.
Xiaohui WangShenzhen Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shenzhen, China. wangxh@szcdc.net.
Shenzhen Center for Disease Control and Prevention · CNSichuan University · CNGuangdong Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSerological test is helpful in confirming and tracking infectious diseases in large population with the advantage of fast and convenience. Using the specific epitope peptides identified from the whole antigen as the detection antigen is sensitive and relatively economical. The development of epitope peptide-based detection kits for COVID-19 patients requires comprehensive information about epitope peptides. But the data on B cell epitope of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein is still limited. More importantly, there is a lack of serological data on the peptides in the population. In this study, we aimed to identify the B cell epitope peptides of spike protein and detect the reactivity in serum samples, for further providing data support for their subsequent serological applications.

resultsTwo B cell linear epitopes, P104 and P82, located in non-RBD region of SARS-CoV-2 S protein were identified by indirect ELISA screening of an overlapping peptide library of the S protein with COVID-19 patients' convalescent serum. And the peptides were verified by testing with 165 serum samples. P104 has not been reported previously; P82 is contained in peptide S21P2 reported before. The positive reaction rates of epitope peptides S14P5 and S21P2, the two non-RBD region epitopes identified by Poh et al., and P82 and P104 were 77.0%, 73.9%, 61.2% and 30.3%, respectively, for 165 convalescent sera, including 30 asymptomatic patients. Although P104 had the lowest positive rate for total patients (30.3%), it exhibited slight advantage for detection of asymptomatic infections (36.7%). Combination of epitopes significantly improved the positive reaction rate. Among all combination patterns, (S14P5 + S21P2 + P104) pattern exhibited the highest positive reaction rate for all patients (92.7%), as well as for asymptomatic infections (86.7%), confirming the feasibility of P104 as supplementary antigen for serological detection. In addition, we analyzed the correlation between epitopes with neutralizing antibody, but only S14P5 had a medium positive correlation with neutralizing antibody titre (r

conclusionOur research proved that epitopes on non-RBD region are of value in serological detection especially when combination more than one epitope, thus providing serological reaction information about the four epitopes, which has valuable references for their usage.

Indexed as

COVID-19Epitopes, B-LymphocyteAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralChildChild, PreschoolCOVID-19 Serological TestingEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralEpitopes, B-LymphocytePeptidesSpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirusspike protein, SARS-CoV-2AntibodyEpitopesHumoral immunitySARS-CoV-2Spike protein

Identifiers

PMID34174835
PMCPMC8234764
OpenAlexW3174229172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.