Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34174787›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2021

Fast dynamic brain PET imaging using stochastic variational prediction for recurrent frame generation.

Amirhossein Sanaat, Ehsan Mirsadeghi, Behrooz Razeghi, Nathalie Ginovart, Habib Zaidi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. A deep learning method for total-body dynamic PET imaging with dual-time-window protocols.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. A deep learning model for generating [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. A review on AI in PET imaging.Annals of nuclear medicine · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Amirhossein SanaatDivision of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland.
Ehsan MirsadeghiElectrical Engineering Department, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran.
Behrooz RazeghiDepartment of Computer Sciences, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Nathalie GinovartDepartment of Psychiatry, Geneva University, Geneva, Switzerland.
Habib ZaidiDivision of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland.

Funding

Swiss National Science Foundation 31003A_179373Swiss National Science Foundation 320030_176052
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe assess the performance of a recurrent frame generation algorithm for prediction of late frames from initial frames in dynamic brain PET imaging.

methodsClinical dynamic

resultsThe predicted dynamic images demonstrated that the model is capable of predicting the trend of change in time-varying tracer biodistribution. The Bland-Altman plots reported the lowest tracer uptake bias (-0.04) for the putamen region and the smallest variance (95% CI: -0.38, +0.14) for the cerebellum. The region-wise Patlak graphical analysis in the caudate and putamen regions for eight subjects from the test and validation dataset showed that the average bias for

conclusionWe have developed a novel deep learning approach for fast dynamic brain PET imaging capable of generating the last 65 minutes time frames from the initial 25 minutes frames, thus enabling significant reduction in scanning time.

Indexed as

Positron-Emission TomographyPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyBrainHumansRetrospective StudiesTissue Distributionbrain imagingdeep learningdynamic imagingPETrecurrent neural network

Identifiers

PMID34174787
PMCPMC8518550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.