Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34174568›Full record

ArticlePoultry science2021

Sensitivity of field isolates of Eimeria acervulina and E. maxima from three regions in Brazil to eight anticoccidial drugs.

A L Kraieski, G B C Salles, E C Muniz, D V J Nascimento, A J Lima Neto, I L Santos, A M B N Madeira

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Poultry science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. UnderstandingFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Focused review: The role of drug combinations for the control of coccidiosis in commercially reared chickens.International journal for parasitology. Drugs and drug resistance · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

A L KraieskiTechnical Department, Zoetis Indústria de Produtos Veterinários Ltda, Dr. Chucri Zaidan Street, 1240, São Paulo, SP, 04709-111, Brazil. Electronic address: antonio.kraieski@zoetis.com.
G B C SallesTechnical Department, Zoetis Indústria de Produtos Veterinários Ltda, Dr. Chucri Zaidan Street, 1240, São Paulo, SP, 04709-111, Brazil.
E C MunizTechnical Department, Zoetis Indústria de Produtos Veterinários Ltda, Dr. Chucri Zaidan Street, 1240, São Paulo, SP, 04709-111, Brazil.
D V J NascimentoTechnical Department, Zoetis Indústria de Produtos Veterinários Ltda, Dr. Chucri Zaidan Street, 1240, São Paulo, SP, 04709-111, Brazil.
A J Lima NetoTechnical Department, Zoetis Indústria de Produtos Veterinários Ltda, Dr. Chucri Zaidan Street, 1240, São Paulo, SP, 04709-111, Brazil.
I L SantosCentro de Amparo à Pesquisa Veterinária, Amparo, SP, 13900-005, Brazil.
A M B N MadeiraLaboratório de Biologia Molecular de Coccídias, Department of Parasitology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, 80035-050 Brazil.
Associação Brasileira de Oncologia Veterinária · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rotation with different active ingredients is among the most effective and recommended strategies to preserve the efficacy of anticoccidial drugs and reduce the emergence of resistance. Tools such as anticoccidial sensitivity tests (ASTs) are ideally used to make rational rotation programs and bring benefits to production. The objective of this study was to evaluate the sensitivity of E. acervulina (EA) and E. maxima (EM) from 3 different regions in Brazil, by using four ASTs. Feces samples weighing 6 to 7 kg were collected in the regions of São Paulo, Paraná, and Minas Gerais. Prevalent oocysts from feces were filtered, identified, and quantified to conduct 2 ASTs with EA and 2 with EM. The same experimental design was used in every AST (4 replicates per treatment, with 6 birds each, for a total of 240 birds). Treatment groups were a nonchallenged and nonmedicated control group (T1), a challenged and nonmedicated control group (T2), and the other groups challenged and treated with the following compounds: lasalocid (90 ppm - T3), maduramycin (6 ppm - T4), decoquinate (30 ppm - T5), nicarbazin+semduramicin (66 ppm - T6), monensin (110 ppm - T7), salinomycin (66 ppm - T8), narasin+nicarbazin (100 ppm - T9), and nicarbazin (125 ppm - T10). At the end of each AST (20 d), the percent change (delta value) between the treated group (T3 to T10) and the control group (T2) was calculated for the following variables: body weight gain, feed conversion ratio, lesion score, and an indicator of percentage of optimal anticoccidial activity (POAA) that included T2. Different sensitivity levels of EA and EM isolates could be identified. As a whole, drugs from T5 and T3 groups showed higher delta values when compared to other compounds, whereas the lowest sensitivity levels of these isolates were observed in groups T4 and T7. Despite some limiting factors, ASTs can be a good tool for strategic selection of anticoccidial drugs in order to maintain efficacy and extend the lifespan of these molecules.

Indexed as

CoccidiosisCoccidiostatsEimeriaPharmaceutical PreparationsPoultry DiseasesAnimalsBrazilChickensCoccidiostatsPharmaceutical Preparationsanticoccidial druganticoccidial resistanceanticoccidial sensitivity testbroiler chickencoccidiosis

Identifiers

PMID34174568
PMCPMC8243008
OpenAlexW3159297506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.