Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34174531›Full record

ReviewJournal of the neurological sciences2021

Classifying epilepsy pragmatically: Past, present, and future.

Nathan A Shlobin, Gagandeep Singh, Charles R Newton, Josemir W Sander

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the neurological sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Characteristics and causes in patients presenting with convulsions in the Danish prehospital setting.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Neuroimaging at 7 Tesla: a pictorial narrative review.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2022
    Review
  6. Dogs as a Natural Animal Model of Epilepsy.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 5 countries.

Nathan A ShlobinDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Gagandeep SinghDepartment of Neurology, Dayanand Medical College, Ludhiana, India; NIHR University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK; Chalfont Centre for Epilepsy, Chalfont St Peter SL9 0RJ, UK.
Charles R NewtonDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Kenya Medical Research Institute, Kilifi, Kenya.
Josemir W SanderNIHR University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK; Stichting Epilepsie InstelClingen Nederland (SEIN), Heemstede, the Netherlands; Chalfont Centre for Epilepsy, Chalfont St Peter SL9 0RJ, UK. Electronic address: l.sander@ucl.ac.uk.
Kenya Medical Research Institute · KENational Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery · GBNeurological Surgery · USStichting Epilepsie Instellingen Nederland · NL

Funding

Wellcome Trust 203077
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The classification of epilepsy is essential for people with epilepsy and their families, healthcare providers, physicians and researchers. The International League Against Epilepsy proposed updated seizure and epilepsy classifications in 2017, while another four-dimensional epilepsy classification was updated in 2019. An Integrated Epilepsy Classification system was proposed in 2020. Existing classifications, however, lack consideration of important pragmatic factors relevant to the day-to-day life of people with epilepsy and stakeholders. Despite promising developments, consideration of comorbidities in brain development, genetic causes, and environmental triggers of epilepsy remains largely user-dependent in existing classifications. Demographics of epilepsy have changed over time, while existing classification schemes exhibit caveats. A pragmatic classification scheme should incorporate these factors to provide a nuanced classification. Validation across disparate contexts will ensure widespread applicability and ease of use. A team-based approach may simplify communication between healthcare personnel, while an individual-centred perspective may empower people with epilepsy. Together, incorporating these elements into a modern but pragmatic classification scheme may ensure optimal care for people with epilepsy by emphasising cohesiveness among its myriad users. Technological advancements such as 7T MRI, next-generation sequencing, and artificial intelligence may affect future classification efforts.

Indexed as

EpilepsyPhysiciansArtificial IntelligenceHumansSeizures2017 ILAE classificationEpilepsyFour-dimensional epilepsy classificationIntegrated epilepsy classification

Identifiers

PMID34174531
PMCPMC7613525
OpenAlexW3170723955

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.