Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34174175›Full record

ArticleJournal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences2021

Retrospective study of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy for Japanese patients with advanced neuroendocrine tumors.

Noritoshi Kobayashi, Damian Wild, Felix Kaul, Takeshi Shimamura, Shoko Takano, Yuma Takeda, Naoki Okubo, Akihiro Suzuki, Motohiko Tokuhisa, Yasushi Ichikawa

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Noritoshi KobayashiDepartment of Oncology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9181-3722
Damian WildDivision of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Felix KaulDivision of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Takeshi ShimamuraShimamura Clinic, Kawasaki, Japan.
Shoko TakanoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.
Yuma TakedaDepartment of Oncology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.
Naoki OkuboDepartment of Oncology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.
Akihiro SuzukiDepartment of Oncology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.
Motohiko TokuhisaDepartment of Oncology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.
Yasushi IchikawaDepartment of Oncology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.
Yokohama City University · JPUniversity Hospital of Basel · CHKawamura Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with radiolabeled somatostatin analogs is an innovative treatment for advanced somatostatin-positive neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). PRRT cannot be performed in Japan because there is no approval or insurance cover so far.

methodsWe relied on foreign institutions to perform PRRT for Japanese patients with NETs. We retrospectively evaluated the safety and efficacy of PRRT. The inclusion criteria were pathologically confirmed well-differentiated NET and visible tumor uptake on pre-therapeutic somatostatin receptor scintigraphy.

resultsThirty-five patients were evaluated, and the primary lesions were pancreas, rectum, small intestine, stomach, and other locations. The partial response rate was 42.9%. Progression-free survival (PFS) was 12.8 months and overall survival was 42.8 months. There was no significant difference in PFS between front-line and late-line PRRT (11.0 months vs 28.0 months; P = .383). Severe adverse events included lymphocytopenia (20.0%) and thrombocytopenia (5.7%). Myelodysplastic syndrome occurred in one case.

conclusionPRRT was effective and safe for Japanese patients with advanced NETs. PRRT was equally effective as front-line and late-line treatment.

Indexed as

Neuroendocrine TumorsHumansJapanRadioisotopesReceptors, PeptideRetrospective StudiesRadioisotopesReceptors, Peptideneuroendocrine tumorpeptide receptor radionuclide therapysomatostatin receptor scintigraphy

Identifiers

PMID34174175
PMCPMC9292713
OpenAlexW3174879447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.