SynthesisJournal of nephrology2021
Maternal and neonatal outcomes of pregnancy complicated by urolithiasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of nephrology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in pregnancy: A comprehensive review and technical insights.Asian journal of urology · 2025Review
- Does type of anesthesia during procedural management of suspected renal colic during pregnancy have an impact on preterm birth?Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2025Article
- Maternal-Fetal Complications in Renal Colic during Pregnancy: A Scoping Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Urological Challenges during Pregnancy: Current Status and Future Perspective on Ureteric Stent Encrustation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Podocytopathy Associated with IgA Nephropathy in Pregnancy: A Challenging Association.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Septic Shock Induced by Acute Pyelonephritis Resulting from Kidney Stones Treated by Double-J Ureteral Stents in a Pregnant Woman: A Case Report and Literature Review.The American journal of case reports · 2022Review
- The Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy: A Focus on Definitions for Clinical Nephrologists.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Pregnancy Outcomes in a Cohort of Patients Who Underwent Double-J Ureteric Stenting-A Single Center Experience.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2022Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe effect of urolithiasis on pregnancy-related outcomes remains unknown. The aim of this study was to determine the risk of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes.
methodsWe searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library through December 2020 for studies reporting on adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes in patients with urolithiasis. Risk ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for these outcomes in pregnant mothers with urolithiasis and compared to healthy controls.
resultsEight studies comprising 26,577 mothers with urolithiasis were included in our analysis. Preterm birth (OR = 1.63; 95% CI 1.37-1.95, p < 0.001) or very preterm birth risk (OR = 1.49, 95% CI 1.06-2.11, p = 0.02) was more common in patients with urolithiasis compared to healthy controls. Mothers with urolithiasis had an increased incidence of preeclampsia (OR = 1.75, 95% CI 1.33-2.3, p < 0.001), hypertension (OR = 2.97, 95% CI 1.31-6.71, p = 0.009), caesarean section (OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.11-1.55, p = 0.001), and gestational diabetes mellitus (OR 1.84, 95% CI 1.37-2.46, p < 0.001).
conclusionPatients with urolithiasis may be at increased risk of developing adverse maternal or neonatal outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.