Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34173659›Full record

Trial reportJournal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society2021

Prospective Evaluation of Galactomannan and (1→3) β-d-Glucan Assays as Diagnostic Tools for Invasive Fungal Disease in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults With Acute Myeloid Leukemia Receiving Fungal Prophylaxis.

Brian T Fisher, Ted Westling, Craig L K Boge, Theoklis E Zaoutis, Christopher C Dvorak, Michael Nieder, Danielle M Zerr, John R Wingard, Doojduen Villaluna, Adam J Esbenshade and 4 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Recent developments inMicrobiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.

Brian T FisherDivision of Infectious Diseases, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Ted WestlingDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, Massachusetts, USA.
Craig L K BogeDivision of Infectious Diseases, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Theoklis E ZaoutisDivision of Infectious Diseases, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Christopher C DvorakDivision of Pediatric Allergy, Immunology and Bone Marrow Transplant, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Michael NiederDivision of Blood and Marrow Transplant and Cellular Immunotherapy, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Danielle M ZerrDivision of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington, USA.
John R WingardUniversity of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Doojduen VillalunaChildren's Oncology Group, Monrovia, California, USA.
Adam J EsbenshadeDivision of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Sarah AlexanderDivision of Haematology Oncology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Suphansa GunnMiravista Diagnostics, LLC, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Lawrence J WheatMiravista Diagnostics, LLC, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Lillian SungDivision of Haematology Oncology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia · USHospital for Sick Children · CAChildren's Oncology Group · USFlorida College · USMoffitt Cancer Center · USSeattle Children's Hospital · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Massachusetts Amherst · USVanderbilt University Medical Center · US

Funding

NCTN BIQSFP ANBL1531 (NRT)U10CA180886 · NCI · PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE · PI Douglas S. Hawkins · 2014 to 2026
$390.6M
COG SDMC - Statistics CoreU10CA180899 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI TODD A ALONZO · 2014 to 2026
$132.8M
Towards a preventive cancer vaccine for children with constitutional mismatch repair deficiencyUG1CA189955 · NCI · PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE · PI BRAD H POLLOCK, Michael E. Roth · 2014 to 2026
$62.5M
CCR NIH HHS HHSN261200800001CChildren's Oncology Group U10CA 180886Children's Oncology Group U10CA 180886NCI NIH HHS HHSN261200800001ENCI NIH HHS U10 CA180886NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180899NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA189955
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients receiving chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are at high risk for invasive fungal disease (IFD). Diagnosis of IFD is challenging, leading to interest in fungal biomarkers. The objective was to define the utility of surveillance testing with Platelia Aspergillus galactomannan (GM) enzyme immunoassay (EIA) and Fungitell β-d-glucan (BDG) assay in children with AML receiving antifungal prophylaxis.

methodsTwice-weekly surveillance blood testing with GM EIA and BDG assay was performed during periods of neutropenia in the context of a randomized trial of children, adolescents, and young adults with AML allocated to fluconazole or caspofungin prophylaxis. Proven or probable IFD was adjudicated using blinded central reviewers. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated for Platelia and Fungitell assays alone and in combination for the outcomes of proven and probable invasive aspergillosis (IA) or invasive candidiasis (IC).

resultsAmong 471 patients enrolled, 425 participants (209 fluconazole and 216 caspofungin) contributed ≥1 blood specimen. In total, 6103 specimens were evaluated, with a median of 15 specimens per patient (range 1-43). The NPV was >99% for GM EIA and BDG assay alone and in combination. However, there were no true positive results, resulting in sensitivity and PPV for each assay of 0%.

conclusionsThe GM EIA and the BDG assay alone or in combination were not successful at detecting IA or IC during periods of neutropenia in children, adolescents, and young adults with AML receiving antifungal prophylaxis. Utilization of these assays for surveillance in this clinical setting should be discouraged.

Indexed as

beta-GlucansInvasive Fungal InfectionsLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteAdolescentChildGalactoseGlucansHumansMannansSensitivity and SpecificityYoung Adultbeta-GlucansgalactomannanGalactoseGlucansMannansacute myeloid leukemiafungal biomarkersfungal diseasepediatricssurveillance

Identifiers

PMID34173659
PMCPMC8527733
OpenAlexW3176744059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.