ArticleJournal of affective disorders reports2020
Caring for anxiety among adults in the face of COVID-19: A cross-sectional online survey.
Article in Journal of affective disorders reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Adjunctive individual meaning-centered psychotherapy plus protocolized fluoxetine for moderate-to-severe adolescent depression.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
- Youth mental health before and after the control of the coronavirus disease 2019: A nationally representative cohort study of Chinese college students.Journal of affective disorders reports · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe outbreak of COVID-19 poses a challenge to psychological resilience. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of anxiety and identify risk and protective factors associated with the presence of anxiety symptoms in the face of COVID-19 among adults.
methodsA cross-sectional online survey was conducted in adults from March 2nd to March 16th 2020. The self-rating anxiety scale (SAS) was used to measure the status of anxiety. Unconditional multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify the factors associated with anxiety.
resultsAmong the 7144 respondents, 9.3% met the criteria for anxiety risk based on the SAS. Symptoms of anxiety were more prevalent among farmer (OR=1.43, 95%CI: 1.03-1.99), respondents lived in urban out of Beijing during the COVID-19 outbreak (OR=1.73, 95%CI: 1.14-2.63), and slept less than six hours per day (OR=2.64, 95%CI: 1.96-3.57). Compared to participants who didn't exercise, a lower risk of anxiety was observed in those exercised 30-60 minutes/day (OR=0.62, 95%CI: 0.41-0.94) and more than 60 minutes/day (OR=0.57, 95%CI: 0.37-0.88). And compared with participants whose knowledge and perceptions of COVID-9 scores in lower quartile, the OR (95%CI) for the second, third and upper quartile were 0.58 (0.46, 0.73), 0.48 (0.37, 0.61) and 0.42(0.33, 0.52), respectively. LIMITATIONS: No diagnostic interview for mental disorders was administered in the original studies limiting analysis of sensitivity and specificity of the Swahili PHQ-9.
conclusionThere was a high level of anxiety in the face of COVID-19 among adults. The results point to characteristics of adults in particular need for attention to anxiety and suggest possible targets for intervention such as strengthening of physical activity and knowledge and perceptions of COVID-19.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.