Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34173588›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Western Pacific2020

Emergency care status, priorities and standards for the Pacific region: A multiphase survey and consensus process across 17 different Pacific Island Countries and Territories.

Georgina Phillips, Anne Creaton, Pai Airdhill-Enosa, Patrick Toito'ona, Berlin Kafoa, Gerard O'Reilly, Peter Cameron

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. The underpinning of emergency care development is education.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Georgina PhillipsSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 553St. Kilda Rd., Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia.
Anne CreatonSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 553St. Kilda Rd., Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia.
Pai Airdhill-EnosaDirector, Emergency Department, Tupua Tamasese Meaole Hospital, Apia, Samoa.
Patrick Toito'onaDeputy Director, Emergency Department, National Referral Hospital, Honiara, Solomon Islands.
Berlin KafoaDirector, Clinical Services Program, Public Health Division, Secretariat of the Pacific Community, Suva, Fiji.
Gerard O'ReillySchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 553St. Kilda Rd., Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia.
Peter CameronSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 553St. Kilda Rd., Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEffective emergency care (EC) reduces mortality, aids disaster and outbreak response, and is necessary for universal health coverage. Surge events frequently challenge Pacific Island Countries and Territories (PICTs), where robust routine EC is required for resilient health systems. We aimed to describe the current status, determine priority actions and set minimum standards for EC systems development across the Pacific region.

methodsWe used a prospective, multiphase, expert consensus process to collect data from PICT EC stakeholders using focus groups, electronic surveys and panel review between August 2018 and April 2019. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, consensus agreement and graphic interpretation. We structured the research according to the World Health Organisation EC Systems and building block framework adapted for the Pacific context.

findingsOver 200 participants from 17 PICTs engaged in at least one component of the multiphase process. Gaps in functional capacity exist in most PICTs for both facility-based and pre-hospital care. EC is a low priority across the Pacific and integrated poorly with disaster plans. Participants emphasised human resource support and government recognition of EC as priority actions, and generated 24 facility-based and 22 pre-hospital Pacific EC standards across all building blocks.

interpretationPICT stakeholders now have baseline indicators and a comprehensive roadmap for EC development within a globally recognised health systems framework. This study generates practical, context-appropriate tools to trigger further research, conduct evidence-based advocacy, drive future improvements and measure progress towards achieving universal health access for Pacific peoples.

fundingSecretariat of the Pacific Community (partial).

Indexed as

ConsensusEmergency careEmergency medical servicesHealth PrioritiesHealth systemsPacific Islands/Pacific regionWorld Health Organisation

Identifiers

PMID34173588
PMCPMC7382998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.