Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34173512›Full record

ArticleSocial sciences & humanities open2021

Viral surveillance: Governing social isolation in São Paulo, Brazil, during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Alcides Eduardo Dos Reis Peron, Daniel Edler Duarte, Letícia Simões-Gomes, Marcelo Batista Nery

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social sciences & humanities open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. COVID-19: what is not being addressed.Environment and urbanization · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alcides Eduardo Dos Reis Peron(Postdoctoral Researcher) Department of Sociology, University of São Paulo, Av. Prof. Luciano Gualberto, 315, Butantã, São Paulo, 05508-010, Brazil.
Daniel Edler Duarte(Postdoctoral Researcher) Department of Sociology, University of São Paulo, Av. Prof. Luciano Gualberto, 315, Butantã, São Paulo, 05508-010, Brazil.
Letícia Simões-Gomes(Researcher) Center for the Studies of Violence, University of São Paulo, Av. Prof. Almeida Prado, Butantã, São Paulo, 05508-010, Brazil.
Marcelo Batista Nery(Researcher) Center for the Studies of Violence, University of São Paulo, Av. Prof. Almeida Prado, Butantã, São Paulo, 05508-010, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the context of COVID-19 pandemics, Brazilian cities implemented social isolation policies and deployed digital systems to monitor urban mobility. This article addresses the setting of two digital technologies based on massive cell-phone data collection by private companies in São Paulo state. We relied on secondary data from multiple sources (press conferences, interviews, newspaper articles, public documents), complemented by primary data from the authors' ongoing research. In our analysis of heterogeneous and contingent techniques of pandemic control, we found that although these monitoring technologies seem to be effective in assisting public services and informing society, they also raise issues about performativity and transparency, with relevant consequences for their adoption in sanitary emergencies, and their potential legacy to São Paulo's public safety management.

Indexed as

COVID-19 pandemicDigital technologyHealth securityHuman rightsSurveillance

Identifiers

PMID34173512
PMCPMC7888255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.