Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34173211›Full record

ArticleBrazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]2021

Antimicrobial effects of sophorolipid in combination with lactic acid against poultry-relevant isolates.

Victória Akemi Itakura Silveira, Renata Katsuko Takayama Kobayashi, Admilton Gonçalves de Oliveira Junior, Mario Sérgio Mantovani, Gerson Nakazato, Maria Antonia Pedrine Colabone Celligoi

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology], 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Exploring Biosurfactants as Antimicrobial Approaches.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Victória Akemi Itakura SilveiraDepartment of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, State University of Londrina, Mailbox 10.011, Londrina, Paraná, 86057-970, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9690-3391
Renata Katsuko Takayama KobayashiDepartment of Microbiology, State University of Londrina, Mailbox 10.011, Londrina, Paraná, 86057-970, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7170-2155
Admilton Gonçalves de Oliveira JuniorDepartment of Microbiology, State University of Londrina, Mailbox 10.011, Londrina, Paraná, 86057-970, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1556-5146
Mario Sérgio MantovaniDepartment of General Biology, State University of Londrina, Mailbox 10.011, Londrina, Paraná, 86057-970, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5268-6508
Gerson NakazatoDepartment of Microbiology, State University of Londrina, Mailbox 10.011, Londrina, Paraná, 86057-970, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8624-795X
Maria Antonia Pedrine Colabone CelligoiDepartment of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, State University of Londrina, Mailbox 10.011, Londrina, Paraná, 86057-970, Brazil. macelligoi@uel.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2217-8937
Universidade Estadual de Londrina · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the antibacterial effect of sophorolipid in combination with lactic acid against relevant bacteria isolated from the poultry industry. Staphylococcus aureus, Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella enterica, and Escherichia coli were isolated from chicken meat and antibacterial tests with sophorolipid and lactic acid were performed. Checkerboard, time-kill, and scanning electron microscopy analyses were used to confirm the antibacterial action and the combined effects. Although no inhibitory effects were observed for E. coli and Salmonella, these compounds presented antibacterial activity against L. monocytogenes and S. aureus. Additionally, sophorolipid and lactic acid were not cytotoxic at the concentrations used in the tests. The combination of sophorolipid and lactic acid resulted in an additive interaction, reducing the concentration of the active compounds needed for effectiveness against S. aureus and L. monocytogenes, to 50% and 75%, respectively. These findings lead to the possibility of developing a new, sustainable, and natural antimicrobial solution that is considered noncytotoxic and has wide applicability in the poultry industry to reduce substantial losses in this sector.

Indexed as

Food MicrobiologyLactic AcidOleic AcidsAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriaEscherichia coliListeria monocytogenesMeatPoultrySalmonella entericaStaphylococcus aureusAnti-Bacterial AgentsLactic AcidOleic AcidssophorolipidAdditive effectListeria monocytogenesPoultry pathogensSophorolipidStaphylococcus aureus

Identifiers

PMID34173211
PMCPMC8578371
OpenAlexW3175690884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.