ReviewPaediatric drugs2021
Navigating the Regulatory Landscape to Develop Pediatric Oncology Drugs: Expert Opinion Recommendations.
Review in Paediatric drugs, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Accelerating Pediatric Oncology Drug Development: Advances in Clinical Pharmacology, Trial Design, Non-Clinical Evidence, and Regulatory Science.Journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Review
- New Quinoline Kinase Inhibitors With Good Selectivity for NAK Kinases and Anti-Tumor Activity Against Ewing Sarcoma.Archiv der Pharmazie · 2026Article
- Therapeutic approaches for targeting the pediatric brain tumor microenvironment.Drug delivery and translational research · 2025Review
- Lineage dependence of the neuroblastoma surfaceome defines tumor cell state-dependent and -independent immunotherapeutic targets.Neuro-oncology · 2025Article
- Retrospective analysis of the efficacy and safety of anlotinib plus sintilimab (anti-PD-1) as maintenance therapy in advanced pediatric solid tumors.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Off-label prescribing of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy at a single pediatric cancer center.Cancer medicine · 2024Article
- Review
- Pediatric oncology drug development and dosage optimization.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Review
- Racial Disparities in Renal Outcomes Over Time Among Hospitalized Children With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2022Article
- Analysis of Paediatric Clinical Trial Characteristics and Activity Over 23 Years-Impact of the European Paediatric Regulation on a Single French Clinical Research Center.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Regulatory changes have been enacted in the United States (US) and European Union (EU) to encourage the development of new treatments for pediatric cancer. Here, we review some of the factors that have hampered the development of pediatric cancer treatments and provide a comparison of the US and EU regulations implemented to address this clinical need. We then provide some recommendations for each stage of the oncology drug development pathway to help researchers maximize their chance of successful drug development while complying with regulations. A key recommendation is the engagement of key stakeholders such as regulatory authorities, pediatric oncologists, academic researchers, patient advocacy groups, and a Pediatric Expert Group early in the drug development process. During drug target selection, sponsors are encouraged to consult the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), European Medicines Agency (EMA), and the FDA target list, in addition to relevant US and European consortia that have been established to characterize and prioritize oncology drug targets. Sponsors also need to carefully consider the resourcing requirements for preclinical testing, which include ensuring appropriate access to the most relevant databases, clinical samples, and preclinical models (cell lines and animal models). During clinical development, sponsors can account for the pharmacodynamic (PD)/pharmacokinetic (PK) considerations specific to a pediatric population by developing pediatric formulations, selecting suitable PD endpoints, and employing sparse PK sampling or modeling/simulation of drug exposures where appropriate. Additional clinical considerations include the specific design of the clinical trial, the potential inclusion of children in adult trials, and the value of cooperative group trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.