Trial reportPituitary2021
Oral octreotide capsules for the treatment of acromegaly: comparison of 2 phase 3 trial results.
Trial report in Pituitary, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Efficacy and Safety of Oral Octreolin™ in Patients With Acromegaly Who Are Currently Receiving Parenteral Somatostatin Analogs
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multicenter Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Octreotide Capsules in Patients Who Demonstrated Biochemical Control on Injectable Somatostatin Receptor Ligands (SRL) Treatment
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Management of liver metastases from non-functional gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a systematic review.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Pooled it
- Current treatment landscape of acromegaly.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2026Review
- Preoperative medical therapy for acromegaly: current knowledge and clinical significance.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Review
- Evaluation of Biologics ACE2/Ang(1-7) Encapsulated in Plant Cells for FDA Approval: Safety and Toxicology Studies.Pharmaceutics · 2024Article
- Medical treatment of functional pituitary adenomas, trials and tribulations.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2024Review
- Clinical Pharmacology of Oral Octreotide Capsules for the Treatment of Acromegaly.TouchREVIEWS in endocrinology · 2024Review
- Treatment Patterns, Adherence, Persistence, and Health Care Resource Utilization in Acromegaly: A Real-World Analysis.Journal of the Endocrine Society · 2023Article
- Discovery of Paltusotine (CRN00808), a Potent, Selective, and Orally Bioavailable Non-peptide SST2 Agonist.ACS medicinal chemistry letters · 2023Article
- Current and Emerging Medical Therapies in Pituitary Tumors.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Potentials of Neuropeptides as Therapeutic Agents for Neurological Diseases.Biomedicines · 2022Review
- Challenges and opportunities in delivering oral peptides and proteins.Expert opinion on drug deliveryReview
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
14 authors at 12 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
Abstract
purposeResults are presented from 2 to 3 trials investigating oral octreotide capsules (OOC) as an alternative to injectable somatostatin receptor ligands (iSRLs) in the treatment of acromegaly.
methodsCH-ACM-01 was an open-label trial (N = 155) and CHIASMA OPTIMAL was a double-blind placebo-controlled (DPC) trial (N = 56), both investigating OOC as maintenance therapy for patients with acromegaly who were biochemical responders receiving iSRLs.
resultsBaseline characteristics in both trials reflected those expected of patients with acromegaly responding to treatment and were similar between trials, despite differences in inclusion criteria. OOC demonstrated a consistent degree of biochemical response across trials, with 65% of patients in CH-ACM-01 maintaining response during the core period and 64% of patients in CHIASMA OPTIMAL at the end of the DPC. Mean insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) levels remained within inclusion criteria at the end of treatment in both trials. Of 110 patients entering the fixed-dose phase in CH-ACM-01, 80% maintained or improved acromegaly symptoms from baseline to the end of treatment. Over 85% of patients in both trials elected to continue into the extension phases. OOC were found to be well tolerated across both trials, and no dose-related adverse events were observed.
conclusionsOOC demonstrated remarkably consistent results for biochemical response, durability of response, and preference to continue with oral treatment across these 2 complementary landmark phase 3 trials, despite differences in the design of each. Trial registration NCT03252353 (August 2017), NCT01412424 (August 2011).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.