ArticlePituitary2021
Frailty does not preclude surgical success after endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenomas.
Article in Pituitary, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Frailty and pituitary surgery: a systematic review.Pituitary · 2025Pooled it
- Quality of life in non-functioning pituitary adenoma: A systematic review.Neurosurgical review · 2024Pooled it
- Determinants of quality of life following resection of skull base tumors: a systematic review.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Pooled it
- Utility of hospital frailty risk score for predicting postoperative outcomes in craniopharyngioma.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2022Article
- Predictors of visual and endocrine outcomes after endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenomas.Neurosurgical review · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionFrailty is a state of physiological vulnerability that negatively influences surgical outcomes. The effect of frailty on pituitary adenoma surgery, however, is not clear, and patients may be wrongly denied surgery because they are "too frail". We examined the effects of frailty on surgical outcome and quality-of-life (QoL) in patients undergoing endoscopic transsphenoidal resection of pituitary adenomas.
methodsA prospective, consecutive cohort of surgically managed pituitary adenoma was analysed. Frailty was defined by the 5-factor modified Frailty Index (mFI-5) and the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). QoL was measured by the anterior skull base questionnaire (ASBQ) and sinonasal outcomes test (SNOT).
resultsOf 304 patients with pituitary adenomas, 42 (13.8%) were frail (mFI5 of > 1). Frail patients tended to have smaller adenomas (p < 0.0001) with less suprasellar extension (p < 0.0001). Both overall (ASBQ) and sinonasal-specific (SNOT) QoL were not affected by frailty on multivariate analysis. Endocrine and visual outcomes were similarly not worsened by frailty. Overall, medical complications were uncommon, and perioperative morbidity or mortality was not significantly greater in the frail group.
conclusionFrail patients experience the same QoL benefits from surgery as their non-frail counterparts, and have equivalently successful visual and endocrine outcomes. Frailty should not be seen as a barrier to successful surgical management of pituitary adenomas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.