Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34173124›Full record

ArticleMedicine, health care, and philosophy2021

Shades of hope: Marcel's notion of hope in end-of-life care.

Marta Szabat, Jeanette Bresson Ladegaard Knox

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, health care, and philosophy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Marta SzabatDepartment of Philosophy and Bioethics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Medical College, Jagiellonian University, Michalowskiego 12, 31-126, Krakow, Poland. mszab@poczta.fm.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5198-3842
Jeanette Bresson Ladegaard KnoxDepartment of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, building 10, 1014, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

Narodowe Centrum Nauki 2019/03/X/HS1/01556
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article examines the compatibility and relevance of Gabriel Marcel's phenomenology of hope in interdisciplinary research on the role of hope in end-of-life (EOL) care. Our analysis is divided into three thematic topics which examine the various shades of hope observed in Marcel's phenomenology of hope and in the collection of 20 EOL studies on hope as experienced by adult palliative care (PC) patients, health care professionals (HCP) and parents of terminally ill children. The three topics defining the shades of hope are: the meaning of hope in its dynamic aspects, the dialectics of hope and despair, and the transcendent facets of hope. We analyse how Marcel's understanding of hope is reflected in EOL studies, and how this perception can enrich the philosophy of PC and significantly deepen and broaden HCPs' understanding of hope. Our findings prove that despite terminological differences between Marcelian phenomenology and the concepts of hope in the 20 EOL studies, hope emerges as a resourceful movement towards being. Implementing Marcelian hope within communication in EOL care could help in HCPs' interpersonal approach to patients as his concept harbors a holistic perception of the existential situation of a person. Equally, introducing Marcel's phenomenology of hope into the clinical encounter could play a beneficial role in improving the ability of patients to adapt to the difficult conditions of their disease and PC treatment.

Indexed as

Hospice CareTerminal CareAdultChildExistentialismHumansPalliative CareTerminally IllEnd-of-life-careMarcelPalliative carePhenomenology of hopeTerminally ill

Identifiers

PMID34173124
PMCPMC8557168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.