Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34173123›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2021

Barriers and facilitators to reducing anticholinergic burden: a qualitative systematic review.

Carrie Stewart, Katie Gallacher, Athagran Nakham, Moira Cruickshank, Rumana Newlands, Christine Bond, Phyo Kyaw Myint, Debi Bhattacharya, Frances S Mair

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Carrie StewartAgeing Clinical and Experimental Research (ACER) Team, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, 1:128, Polwarth Building, Foresterhill Health Campus, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, UK. carrie.stewart@abdn.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2325-3380
Katie GallacherGeneral Practice and Primary Care, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Athagran NakhamAgeing Clinical and Experimental Research (ACER) Team, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, 1:128, Polwarth Building, Foresterhill Health Campus, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, UK.
Moira CruickshankHealth Services Research Unit, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Rumana NewlandsHealth Services Research Unit, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Christine BondPrimary Care, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Phyo Kyaw MyintAgeing Clinical and Experimental Research (ACER) Team, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, 1:128, Polwarth Building, Foresterhill Health Campus, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, UK.
Debi BhattacharyaSchool of Pharmacy, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Frances S MairGeneral Practice and Primary Care, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.

Funding

Chief Scientist Office HSRU1The Dunhill Medical Trust RPGF1806/66
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Despite common use, anticholinergic medications have been associated with serious health risks. Interventions to reduce their use are being developed and there is a need to understand their implementation into clinical care. Aim of review This systematic review aims to identify and analyse qualitative research studies exploring the barriers and facilitators to reducing anticholinergic burden. Methods Medline (OVID), EMBASE (OVID), CINAHL (EMBSCO) and PsycINFO (OVID) were searched using comprehensive search terms. Peer reviewed studies published in English presenting qualitative research in relation to the barriers and facilitators of deprescribing anticholinergic medications, involving patients, carers or health professionals were eligible. Normalization Process Theory was used to explore and explain the data. Results Of 1764 identified studies, two were eligible and both involved healthcare professionals (23 general practitioners, 13 specialist clinicians and 12 pharmacists). No studies were identified that involved patients or carers. Barriers to collaborative working often resulted in poor motivation to reduce anticholinergic use. Low confidence, system resources and organisation of care also hindered anticholinergic burden reduction. Good communication and relationships with patients, carers and other healthcare professionals were reported as important for successful anticholinergic burden reduction. Having a named person for prescribing decisions, and clear role boundaries, were also important facilitators. Conclusions This review identified important barriers and facilitators to anticholinergic burden reduction from healthcare provider perspectives which can inform implementation of such deprescribing interventions. Studies exploring patient and carer perspectives are presently absent but are required to ensure person-centeredness and feasibility of future interventions.

Indexed as

Cholinergic AntagonistsHealth PersonnelCaregiversHumansPharmacistsQualitative ResearchCholinergic AntagonistsAnticholinergicsDeprescribingIntervention implementationQualitative researchSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID34173123
PMCPMC8642323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.