ArticleBulletin of experimental biology and medicine2021
Pulmonary Microcirculation during Experimental Pulmonary Thromboembolism under Conditions of Activation and Blockade of Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptors.
Article in Bulletin of experimental biology and medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Changes of Pulmonary Microhemodynamics in Experimental Pulmonary Thromboembolism after Pretreatment with K-Channel Activators.Bulletin of experimental biology and medicine · 2022Article
- Clinical Characteristics of Patients with Pulmonary Thromboembolism Based on Computer Statistical Analysis.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Changes in pulmonary microcirculation were studied in isolated perfused rabbit lungs during modelling pulmonary thromboembolism under conditions of acetylcholine infusion against the background of treatment with M1 acetylcholine receptor blocker pirenzepine or blockade of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors with atropine. In the first case, the increase in pulmonary artery pressure was less pronounced than in case of atropine treatment. In response to pulmonary embolism after acetylcholine infusion against the background of pirenzepine pretreatment, the capillary hydrostatic pressure and postcapillary resistance did not change, while after atropine treatment, these parameters increased. In case of pulmonary embolism after acetylcholine infusion combined with selective blockade of M1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptors, the capillary filtration coefficient increased to a greater extent, than in the control and after blockade of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.