Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34173051›Full record

ArticleClinical oral investigations2022

Diagnosis of interproximal caries lesions with deep convolutional neural network in digital bitewing radiographs.

Yusuf Bayraktar, Enes Ayan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yusuf BayraktarDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Kirikkale University, Kirikkale, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6250-5651
Enes AyanDepartment of Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Kirikkale University, Yahsihan, Kirikkale, Turkey. enesayan@kku.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5463-8064

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of deep convolutional neural network (CNN) in the diagnosis of interproximal caries lesions in digital bitewing radiographs. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 1,000 digital bitewing radiographs were randomly selected from the database. Of these, 800 were augmented and annotated as "decay" by two experienced dentists using a labeling tool developed in Python programming language. The 800 radiographs were consisted of 11,521 approximal surfaces of which 1,847 were decayed (lesion prevalence for train data was 16.03%). A CNN model known as you only look once (YOLO) was modified and trained to detect caries lesions in bitewing radiographs. After using the other 200 radiographs to test the effectiveness of the proposed CNN model, the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were calculated.

resultsThe lesion prevalence for test data was 13.89%. The overall accuracy of the CNN model was 94.59% (94.19% for premolars, 94.97% for molars), sensitivity was 72.26% (75.51% for premolars, 68.71% for molars), specificity was 98.19% (97.43% for premolars, 98.91% for molars), PPV was 86.58% (83.61% for premolars, 90.44% for molars), and NPV was 95.64% (95.82% for premolars, 95.47% for molars). The overall AUC was measured as 87.19%.

conclusionsThe proposed CNN model showed good performance with high accuracy scores demonstrating that it could be used in the diagnosis of caries lesions in bitewing radiographs. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Correct diagnosis of dental caries is essential for a correct treatment procedure. CNNs can assist dentists in diagnosing approximal caries lesions in bitewing radiographs.

Indexed as

Dental CariesDental Caries SusceptibilityHumansMolarNeural Networks, ComputerRadiography, BitewingROC CurveArea under curveArtificial intelligenceBitewing radiographyDeep learningDental caries

Identifiers

PMID34173051
PMCPMC8232993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.