Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34172999›Full record

ArticleSchizophrenia bulletin2021

Developing and Validating an Individualized Clinical Prediction Model to Forecast Psychotic Recurrence in Acute and Transient Psychotic Disorders: Electronic Health Record Cohort Study.

Stefano Damiani, Grazia Rutigliano, Teresa Fazia, Sergio Merlino, Carlo Berzuini, Luisa Bernardinelli, Pierluigi Politi, Paolo Fusar-Poli

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Schizophrenia bulletin, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Stefano DamianiDepartment of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Grazia RutiglianoDepartment of Pathology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Teresa FaziaDepartment of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Sergio MerlinoEarly Psychosis: Interventions & Clinical-detection (EPIC) Lab, Department of Psychosis Studies, King's College London, London, UK.
Carlo BerzuiniCenter for Biostatistics, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Luisa BernardinelliDepartment of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Pierluigi PolitiDepartment of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Paolo Fusar-PoliDepartment of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_16048
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute and transient psychotic disorders (ATPDs) include short-lived psychotic episodes with a high probability of developing psychotic recurrences. Clinical care for ATPD is currently limited by the inability to predict outcomes. Real-world electronic health record (EHR)-based retrospective cohort study STROBE/RECORD compliant included all individuals accessing the South London and Maudsley NHS Trust between 2006 and 2017 and receiving a first diagnosis of ATPD (F23, ICD-10). After imputing missing data, stepwise and LASSO Cox regression methods employing a priori predictors (n = 23) were compared to develop and internally validate an individualized risk prediction model to forecast the risk of psychotic recurrences following TRIPOD guidelines. The primary outcome was prognostic accuracy (area under the curve [AUC]). 3018 ATPD individuals were included (average age = 33.75 years, 52.7% females). Over follow-up (average 1042 ± 1011 days, up to 8 years) there were 1160 psychotic recurrences (events). Stepwise (n = 12 predictors) and LASSO (n = 17 predictors) regression methods yielded comparable prognostic accuracy, with an events per variable ratio >100 for both models. Both models showed an internally validated adequate prognostic accuracy from 4 years follow-up (AUC 0.70 for both models) and good calibration. A refined model was adapted in view of the new ICD-11 criteria on 307 subjects with polymorphic ATPD, showing fair prognostic accuracy at 4 years (AUC: stepwise 0.68; LASSO 0.70). This study presents the first clinically based prediction model internally validated to adequately predict long-term psychotic recurrence in individuals with ATPD. The model can be automatable in EHRs, supporting further external validations and refinements to improve its prognostic accuracy.

Indexed as

Disease ProgressionModels, StatisticalAcute DiseaseAdultElectronic Health RecordsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLondonMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisPsychotic DisordersRecurrenceRetrospective StudiesRiskbrief psychotic disorderclinical prediction modelingindividualized prediction acute and transient psychotic disorderpsychosisschizophreniavalidation

Identifiers

PMID34172999
PMCPMC8530399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.