Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34172982›Full record

ArticlePsychiatric research and clinical practice2021

Psychobehavioral Responses, Post-Traumatic Stress and Depression in Pregnancy During the Early Phase of COVID-19 Outbreak.

Casper J P Zhang, Huailiang Wu, Zonglin He, Nga-Kwo Chan, Jian Huang, Huiyun Wang, Zongzhi Yin, Babatunde Akinwunmi, Wai-Kit Ming

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychiatric research and clinical practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The impact of the prolonged COVID-19 pandemic on stress resilience and mental health: A critical review across waves.European neuropsychopharmacology : the journal of the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Casper J P ZhangDepartment of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine Jinan University Guangzhou Guangdong China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1047-0287
Huailiang WuDepartment of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine Jinan University Guangzhou Guangdong China.
Zonglin HeDepartment of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine Jinan University Guangzhou Guangdong China.
Nga-Kwo ChanDepartment of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine Jinan University Guangzhou Guangdong China.
Jian HuangMRC Centre for Environment and Health, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health Imperial College London London UK.
Huiyun WangSchool of Pharmacy Jining Medical University Jining China.
Zongzhi YinDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University Hefei China.
Babatunde AkinwunmiMaternal-Fetal Medicine Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard University Boston USA.
Wai-Kit MingDepartment of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine Jinan University Guangzhou Guangdong China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8846-7515

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak has aroused a range of negative effects. Such considerable influence can be greater in vulnerable populations including pregnant women. This study aimed to assess the presence of prenatal depression (PND, as an important risk factor of postpartum depression) and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and to characterize infection-induced preventive behaviors and psychological responses in the early phase of COVID-19 outbreak. Methods: Based on a population-based sample of pregnant women from all regions in China, presence of probable PND and suspected PTSD were assessed using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (≥13) and the PTSD Checklist (≥14), respectively. A web-based questionnaire was used to assess psychological and behavioral responses to COVID-19. Results: Among a total of 1908 questionnaires returned, 1901 women provided valid data (mean [SD] age, 28.9 [4.7] years). High prevalence of probable PND (34%) and suspected PTSD (40%) among pregnant women was observed. Those with suspected PTSD presented six times higher risk of probable PND than the non-suspected (OR=7.83, 95% CI: 6.29-9.75; p<0.001). Most women (91%-96%) reported anxiousness about infection of themselves and the members within their social network. Lack of security and loss of freedom were reported in approximately two-thirds of pregnant women. More frequent preventive behaviors, including handwashing, use of facemasks, and staying at home, were undertaken in more than 80% of the sample. Anxiousness of miscarriage and preterm birth were prevalent (>75%). Conclusions: High prevalence of PND and PTSD and high levels of anxiety suggest profound impacts of the present outbreak on mental health. This calls for special attention and support for vulnerable populations. Mental health care should become part of public health measures during the present outbreak and should continue to be intensified to empower the health system for post-outbreak periods.

Identifiers

PMID34172982
PMCPMC7753825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.