Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34172973›Full record

ReviewNature protocols2021

Analyzing high-dimensional cytometry data using FlowSOM.

Katrien Quintelier, Artuur Couckuyt, Annelies Emmaneel, Joachim Aerts, Yvan Saeys, Sofie Van Gassen

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature protocols, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 106 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
106citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

106 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. HCV-specific CD4EBioMedicine · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

46 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Katrien QuintelierDepartment of Applied Mathematics, Computer Science and Statistics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Artuur CouckuytDepartment of Applied Mathematics, Computer Science and Statistics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7858-6521
Annelies EmmaneelDepartment of Applied Mathematics, Computer Science and Statistics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Joachim AertsDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Yvan SaeysDepartment of Applied Mathematics, Computer Science and Statistics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0415-1506
Sofie Van GassenDepartment of Applied Mathematics, Computer Science and Statistics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium. sofie.vangassen@ugent.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7119-5330

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The dimensionality of cytometry data has strongly increased in the last decade, and in many situations the traditional manual downstream analysis becomes insufficient. The field is therefore slowly moving toward more automated approaches, and in this paper we describe the protocol for analyzing high-dimensional cytometry data using FlowSOM, a clustering and visualization algorithm based on a self-organizing map. FlowSOM is used to distinguish cell populations from cytometry data in an unsupervised way and can help to gain deeper insights in fields such as immunology and oncology. Since the original FlowSOM publication (2015), we have validated the tool on a wide variety of datasets, and to write this protocol, we made use of this experience to improve the user-friendliness of the package (e.g., comprehensive functions replacing commonly required scripts). Where the original paper focused mainly on the algorithm description, this protocol offers user guidelines on how to implement the procedure, detailed parameter descriptions and troubleshooting recommendations. The protocol provides clearly annotated R code, and is therefore relevant for all scientists interested in computational high-dimensional analyses without requiring a strong bioinformatics background. We demonstrate the complete workflow, starting from data preparation (such as compensation, transformation and quality control), including detailed discussion of the different FlowSOM parameters and visualization options, and concluding with how the results can be further used to answer biological questions, such as statistical comparison between groups of interest. An average FlowSOM analysis takes 1-3 h to complete, though quality issues can increase this time considerably.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsSoftwareCluster AnalysisComputational BiologyData AnalysisFlow Cytometry

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.