ArticleNature2021
Impact factor abandoned by Dutch university in hiring and promotion decisions.
Article in Nature, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Global research trends in the application of artificial intelligence in oncology care: a bibliometric study.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Pooled it
- Quantifying research waste in ecology.Nature ecology & evolution · 2022Pooled it
- Science Is About Thinking: How Can We Protect Thinking Time in a Distracted Digital World?Brain sciences · 2026Review
- Scientists' Warning to Humanity: Unnecessary Bureaucracy Is a Global Impediment to Productivity, Advancement of Human and Planetary Wellbeing, Science and Sustainability.Microbial biotechnology · 2026Article
- Resilience and Recalibration of Bibliometric Indicators in Neurosciences and Neuropharmacology Journals After COVID-19: A Longitudinal Rate of Change Analysis Using Mixed-Effects Models.Current neuropharmacology · 2026Article
- The misalignment of incentives in academic publishing and implications for journal reform.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Systematic reviewers' perspectives on sharing review data, analytic code, and other materials: A survey.Cochrane evidence synthesis and methods · 2023Article
- To dismantle structural racism in science, scientists need to learn how it works.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2023Review
- Bibliometric evaluation of Forensic Science International as a scholarly journal within the subject category legal medicine.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2023Article
- A guide to open science practices for animal research.PLoS biology · 2022Article
- Transparent, Open, and Reproducible Prevention Science.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2022Article
- Declaration of common standards for the preregistration of animal research-speeding up the scientific progress.PNAS nexus · 2022Article
- Close to open-Factors that hinder and promote open science in ecology research and education.PloS one · 2022Article
- Lightweight Structural Materials in Open Access: Latest Trends.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Journal Impact Factor and Self-Citations.Archivum immunologiae et therapiae experimentalis · 2021Article
- Citation report: the nightmares and dreams of the editor: we grew 30.Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Comment on
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34172959What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.