Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34172934›Full record

ArticleOncogene2021

Context-dependent modulation of aggressiveness of pediatric tumors by individual oncogenic RAS isoforms.

Julia Bauer, Nicole Cuvelier, Nada Ragab, Katja Simon-Keller, Frauke Nitzki, Natalie Geyer, Dominik S Botermann, Dominik P Elmer, Albert Rosenberger, Thomas A Rando and 9 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncogene, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 9 institutions in 4 countries.

Julia BauerDepartment of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5390-1855
Nicole CuvelierDepartment of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany.
Nada RagabDepartment of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany.
Katja Simon-KellerInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
Frauke NitzkiDepartment of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany.
Natalie GeyerDepartment of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany.
Dominik S BotermannDepartment of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7747-7147
Dominik P ElmerDepartment of Biosciences, Paris-Lodron University of Salzburg, Cancer Cluster Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-2038-6775
Albert RosenbergerDepartment of Genetic Epidemiology, University Medical Center Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7848-1332
Thomas A RandoPaul F. Glenn Center for the Biology of Aging and Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Stefano BiressiPaul F. Glenn Center for the Biology of Aging and Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
James A FaginMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2365-2517
Dieter SaurKlinik und Poliklinik für Innere Medizin II, Klinikum rechts der Isar der TUM, Muenchen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5874-0210
Christian DullinInstitute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4297-8077
Hans-Ulrich SchildhausInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Essen, Essen, Germany.
Walter Schulz-SchaefferDepartment of Neuropathology, Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg, Germany.
Fritz AbergerDepartment of Biosciences, Paris-Lodron University of Salzburg, Cancer Cluster Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-2009-6305
Anja UhmannDepartment of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany.
Heidi HahnDepartment of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany. hhahn@gwdg.de.ORCID 0000-0002-3646-4566
University of Göttingen · DEUniversity of Salzburg · ATEssen University Hospital · DEHeidelberg University · DEMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USSaarland University · DEStanford University · USTUM Klinikum · DEUniversity of Trento · IT

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Austrian Science Fund FWF P 25629Austrian Science Fund FWF W 1213NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A prototypic pediatric cancer that frequently shows activation of RAS signaling is embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma (ERMS). ERMS also show aberrant Hedgehog (HH)/GLI signaling activity and can be driven by germline mutations in this pathway. We show, that in ERMS cell lines derived from sporadic tumors i.e. from tumors not caused by an inherited genetic variant, HH/GLI signaling plays a subordinate role, because oncogenic mutations in HRAS, KRAS, or NRAS (collectively named oncRAS) inhibit the main HH target GLI1 via the MEK/ERK-axis, but simultaneously increase proliferation and tumorigenicity. oncRAS also modulate expression of stem cell markers in an isoform- and context-dependent manner. In Hh-driven murine ERMS that are caused by a Patched mutation, oncHRAS and mainly oncKRAS accelerate tumor development, whereas oncNRAS induces a more differentiated phenotype. These features occur when the oncRAS mutations are induced at the ERMS precursor stage, but not when induced in already established tumors. Moreover, in contrast to what is seen in human cell lines, oncRAS mutations do not alter Hh signaling activity and marginally affect expression of stem cell markers. Together, all three oncRAS mutations seem to be advantageous for ERMS cell lines despite inhibition of HH signaling and isoform-specific modulation of stem cell markers. In contrast, oncRAS mutations do not inhibit Hh-signaling in Hh-driven ERMS. In this model, oncRAS mutations seem to be advantageous for specific ERMS populations that occur within a specific time window during ERMS development. In addition, this window may be different for individual oncRAS isoforms, at least in the mouse.

Indexed as

Disease SusceptibilityGenes, rasAge FactorsAnimalsCell Transformation, NeoplasticDisease Models, AnimalDisease ProgressionGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansMAP Kinase Signaling SystemMiceMice, KnockoutMutationNeoplasmsNeoplastic Stem CellsGLI1 protein, humanPatched-1 ReceptorProtein IsoformsPTCH1 protein, humanZinc Finger Protein GLI1

Identifiers

PMID34172934
PMCPMC8342309
OpenAlexW3174924604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.