Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34172930›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2021

A preclinical pipeline to evaluate migrastatics as therapeutic agents in metastatic melanoma.

Oscar Maiques, Bruce Fanshawe, Eva Crosas-Molist, Irene Rodriguez-Hernandez, Alessia Volpe, Gaia Cantelli, Lena Boehme, Jose L Orgaz, Faraz K Mardakheh, Victoria Sanz-Moreno and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Amoeboid cancer cells at a glance.Journal of cell science · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Gene editing enables non-invasiveMolecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Amoeboid migration in health and disease: Immune responsesFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Oscar Maiques *Centre for Tumour Microenvironment at Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square Campus, John Vane Science Centre, London, UK.
Bruce Fanshawe *Randall Division of Cell and Molecular Biophysics, King's College London, New Hunt's House, Guy's Campus, London, UK.
Eva Crosas-Molist *Centre for Tumour Microenvironment at Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square Campus, John Vane Science Centre, London, UK.
Irene Rodriguez-HernandezCentre for Tumour Microenvironment at Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square Campus, John Vane Science Centre, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6487-452X
Alessia VolpeImaging Therapies and Cancer Group, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Studies, King's College London, Guy's Campus, London, UK.
Gaia CantelliRandall Division of Cell and Molecular Biophysics, King's College London, New Hunt's House, Guy's Campus, London, UK.
Lena BoehmeRandall Division of Cell and Molecular Biophysics, King's College London, New Hunt's House, Guy's Campus, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7593-7533
Jose L OrgazCentre for Tumour Microenvironment at Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square Campus, John Vane Science Centre, London, UK.
Faraz K MardakhehCentre for Cancer Cell & Molecular Biology at Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square Campus, John Vane Science Centre, London, UK.
Victoria Sanz-MorenoCentre for Tumour Microenvironment at Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square Campus, John Vane Science Centre, London, UK. v.sanz-moreno@qmul.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5096-9456
Gilbert O FruhwirthImaging Therapies and Cancer Group, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Studies, King's College London, Guy's Campus, London, UK. gilbert.fruhwirth@kcl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1438-2674

Funding

Cancer Research UK 21153Cancer Research UK 24478Cancer Research UK C33043/A12065Cancer Research UK C33043/A24478Cancer Research UK C48390/A21153Medical Research Council MR/P009417/1Wellcome Trust WT203148/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMetastasis is a hallmark of cancer and responsible for most cancer deaths. Migrastatics were defined as drugs interfering with all modes of cancer cell invasion and thus cancers' ability to metastasise. First anti-metastatic treatments have recently been approved.

methodsWe used bioinformatic analyses of publicly available melanoma databases. Experimentally, we performed in vitro target validation (including 2.5D cell morphology analysis and mass spectrometric analysis of RhoA binding partners), developed a new traceable spontaneously metastasising murine melanoma model for in vivo validation, and employed histology (haematoxylin/eosin and phospho-myosin II staining) to confirm drug action in harvested tumour tissues.

resultsUnbiased and targeted bioinformatic analyses identified the Rho kinase (ROCK)-myosin II pathway and its various components as potentially relevant targets in melanoma. In vitro validation demonstrated redundancy of several RhoGEFs upstream of RhoA and confirmed ROCK as a druggable target downstream of RhoA. The anti-metastatic effects of two ROCK inhibitors were demonstrated through in vivo melanoma metastasis tracking and inhibitor effects also confirmed ex vivo by digital pathology.

conclusionsWe proposed a migrastatic drug development pipeline. As part of the pipeline, we provide a new traceable spontaneous melanoma metastasis model for in vivo quantification of metastasis and anti-metastatic effects by non-invasive imaging.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell Line, TumorCell MovementComputational BiologyHumansMaleMass SpectrometryMelanomaMiceMyosin Type IINeoplasm MetastasisProtein Interaction MapsProtein Kinase InhibitorsrhoA GTP-Binding Proteinrho-Associated KinasesSignal TransductionMyosin Type IIProtein Kinase InhibitorsrhoA GTP-Binding ProteinRhoA protein, mouserho-Associated Kinases

Identifiers

PMID34172930
PMCPMC8405734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.