ArticleSpinal cord2021
Considerations on the psychometric properties and validity of the Spinal Cord Injury Secondary Conditons Scale.
Article in Spinal cord, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for assessing functioning, disability, and health of people with spinal cord injury - a scoping review.The journal of spinal cord medicine · 2026Article
- Patient-reported effects of transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation on spasticity in patients with spinal cord injury.The journal of spinal cord medicine · 2026Article
- Factors associated with perceived social isolation among veterans with spinal cord injury and disorders: Cross sectional survey.The journal of spinal cord medicine · 2025Article
- Reliability and validity of the Spinal Cord Injury Secondary Conditions Scale among the Turkish population with spinal cord injury.Turkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation · 2024Article
- Effects of Adaptations in an Interdisciplinary Follow-Up Clinic for People with Spinal Cord Injury in the Chronic Phase: A Prospective Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
STUDY
designCross-sectional validation study.
objectivesExplore psychometric properties of Spinal Cord Injury Secondary Conditions Scale (SCI-SCS).
settingTwo Scandinavian rehabilitation centres.
methodsIncluded were 224 consecutive patients attending regular follow-up at least 1 year after a traumatic SCI. Mean age was 49.6 (SD 14.9) years. SCI-SCS floor and ceiling effect examined. Construct validity was investigated by confirmatory factor analysis and correlation analysis, and reliability by Cronbach's alpha.
resultsSCI-SCS showed no floor or ceiling effect. Two out of four earlier reported latent factors ("Genitourinary and bowel", "Muscle structures and pain") were confirmed. The global Cronbach's alpha of SCI-SCS was 0.65 and 0.22-0.61 for the four latent factors. The SCI-SCS sum score showed low correlation to quality of life (QoL) measured by EQ5 VAS (r
conclusionSCI-SCS is a relevant instrument for giving clinicians and researchers an overview of the individual recent experiences with secondary conditions. However, the instrument could benefit from a clearer definition of the construct secondary conditions, a scale revision and a consideration of whether to add other experienced secondary conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34172927What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.