Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34172913›Full record

ArticleEvidence-based dentistry2021

Are there any significant craniomaxillofacial manifestations of COVID-19?

Vaibhav Sahni

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in Evidence-based dentistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Vaibhav SahniPanjab University, Chandigarh, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi, India.
Panjab University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Data sources PubMed/Medline, Biomed Central, Embase, Thai Journals and the Cochrane library.Study selection Reports or studies dealing with the craniomaxillofacial (CMF) manifestations of COVID-19 were selected.Data extraction and synthesis The reviewers extracted data from the included studies; however, being a meta-narrative review, it was not deemed fit to contact authors for unpublished work, conduct a meta-analysis, search for unpublished data or search for studies in languages different from English, German, French and Thai. The primary variable for prediction was set as the COVID-19 infection, with the primary outcome variable being manifestation in the CMF region. Parameters of a clinical, demographic, investigative and therapeutic nature were the other included variables. Subsequently, the reports and abstracted data were reviewed for study design, author names, country, size of the sample, level of evidence, signs/symptoms, treatment undertaken and investigations conducted. Studies exhibiting the highest level of evidence were included eventually. As deemed appropriate, uni/bivariate and descriptive statistics were applied.Results Cumulatively, 101 publications were included in the meta-narrative after due screening, the data of which was further divided into five groups of: 1) nose/paranasal sinus/skull base; 2) mouth/throat; 3) periorbital/ocular tissue; 4) skin; and 5) ear.Conclusions The majority of data pertaining to CMF manifestations of COVID-19 qualifies as a low level of evidence. With the exception of taste/smell dysfunction, most CMF manifestations are nonspecific and can be diagnosed by CMF surgeons and dentists, which underscores their role in battling the pandemic.

Indexed as

COVID-19HumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID34172913
PMCPMC8226332
OpenAlexW3174145175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.