ArticleEvidence-based dentistry2021
Should we test asymptomatic children for SARS-CoV-2?
Article in Evidence-based dentistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- ESCMID guidelines on testing for SARS-CoV-2 in asymptomatic individuals to prevent transmission in the health care setting.Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Design Cross-sectional study.Sample selection This study included 921 children (471 male, 450 female) due to receive either routine dental care involving aerosol generating procedures or comprehensive dental care under general anaesthetic. Data was collected at a paediatric dental clinic associated with the University of Illinois, Chicago. Patients were screened by a telephone questionnaire assessing for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) or severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. Asymptomatic patients and those with no known disease exposure went on to receive a reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test for SARS-CoV-2, the causative pathogen for COVID-19. Those displaying symptoms of COVID-19 or who had potentially been exposed to the virus or disease were not included in this study and were referred for onwards medical advice.Data analysis Electronic dental records were accessed to retrieve patient demographics, insurance type, dental diagnosis and past medical history. The percentage of positive SARS-CoV-2 test results was calculated for each category. Positive and negative test results were compared appropriately for both categorical and continuous variables, with significance reached when p <0.05. SPSS version 27 was used for statistical analysis.Results This study found the positivity rate for SARS-CoV-2 to be 2.3% (21/921) in asymptomatic dental patients aged under 18 years. Age, insurance type, medical history and dental diagnosis were comparable in both positive and negative test result groups. The Hispanic/Latinx population had a higher percentage (3.1%) of positive tests than other groups. More male patients tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 (13 male, 8 female), but this was not statistically significant.Conclusions RT-PCR testing identified children carrying SARS-CoV-2 who had been cleared to attend an appointment following a screening questionnaire.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.