ArticleEvidence-based dentistry2021
Is SARS-CoV-2 present in the periodontium? A post-mortem study.
Article in Evidence-based dentistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Findings and inferences from full autopsies, minimally invasive autopsies and biopsy studies in patients who died as a result of COVID19 - A systematic review.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2022Pooled it
- The Oral Cavity Potentially Serving as a Reservoir for SARS-CoV-2 but Not Necessarily Facilitating the Spread of COVID-19 in Dental Practice.European journal of dentistry · 2023Article
- Post-Operative Bleeding Complications in a Periodontitis Patient Testing Positive for COVID-19.Dentistry journal · 2022Article
- Autopsy findings of pediatric COVID-19: a systematic review.Egyptian journal of forensic sciences · 2022Article
- Do We Really Need Hazard Prevention at the Expense of Safeguarding Death Dignity in COVID-19?Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims To investigate the presence of SARS-CoV-2, the virus responsible for COVID-19 infection, in the periodontal tissues of deceased individuals with a positive SARS-CoV-2 nasopharyngeal swab test.Sample selection Seven deceased individuals, who were admitted to the intensive care unit of the Hospital das Clínicas of the Medicine School of Sao Paulo University for invasive mechanical ventilation following a positive nasopharyngeal COVID-19 test result, underwent a post-mortem examination. Individuals with comorbidities were included. Exclusion criteria included a current smoking habit.Design A cross-sectional study involving a videoscope-guided autopsy to obtain a periodontal tissue sample. The plastic body wrapping was incised in the facial region, allowing the insertion of a video endoscope. A single sample of periodontal tissue (junctional epithelium, adjacent oral epithelium and underlying connective tissue) was obtained from the mesial interproximal papilla of the maxillary first molar (or if absent, the mesial tooth). The sample was cleaned using an enzymatic detergent (Riozyme) to mimic the effects of salivary flow and was collected using blunt dissection. The sample was divided into two samples for either histopathological analysis (haematoxylin and eosin stain) or molecular analysis. Real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) was used to test for the presence of the envelope (E) gene of SARS-CoV-2. Data on comorbidities, smoking status, period of hospitalisation and time from onset of symptoms to death were also collected.Data analysis Descriptive analysis was performed and results were presented as a cross tabulation. The presence of SARS-CoV-2 in samples was presented as the rRT-PCR cycle threshold value and the histopathological analysis results were Boolean (that is, presence/absence of vacuolisation or nuclear pleomorphism).Results A total of seven individuals were examined: four women and three men. The age range was 8-74 years and the range of periods between onset of symptoms and death was 10-31 days. SARS-CoV-2 was detected in five samples, with a mean cycle threshold of 31.38 (range 27.28-36.55). Nuclear pleomorphism and vacuolisation were found in two and three cases, respectively.Conclusions SARS-CoV-2 genetic material was present in most periodontal tissue samples of individuals with COVID-19. The sample size, however, was small and only included severely ill individuals with prolonged periods of hospitalisation. Consequently, the applicability of the findings to the general population is limited.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.