ArticleEvidence-based dentistry2021
What are the effects of portable air cleaners with a high-efficiency particulate air filter on aerosol removal in dental surgeries?
Article in Evidence-based dentistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Reduction by air purifier of particulate concentration during orthodontic procedures: a pilot study.BMC oral health · 2024Article
- Coronavirus outbreaks and infection prevention in dentistry: a narrative review.Canadian journal of dental hygiene : CJDH = Journal canadien de l'hygiene dentaire : JCHD · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Design Volumetric air flow was measured in a number of dental surgeries to calculate the air change rate per hour (ACHvent). In each surgery, measurements of aerosol removal by ventilation alone, and then with ventilation provided by a high-efficiency particulate air filter (PAC), were completed. The concentrations of aerosol particles of various sizes were recorded at baseline, after an initial period of incense burn, and then after 30 minutes of observation with and without the use of the PAC or ventilation system.Sample selection Ten dental surgeries with differing baseline ventilation rates had the concentrations of 0.3, 0.5 and 1.0 μm aerosol particles measured at 0 minutes, after 5 minutes of incense burn and then after 30 minutes of observation, firstly without the PAC system in operation and then with the PAC system in use.Data analysis For the 0.3 μm particles, velocities of aerosol removal were assessed by analysing the concentration decay constants with ventilation alone and ventilation with the PAC. Aerosol removal velocities were assessed by the time needed to reach 95% and 100% removal of accumulated aerosol particles.Results ACHvent in the ten different surgeries varied from 3-45. The concentration decay constants for the 0.3 μm particles with ventilation alone and ventilation with the PAC were correlated to the mechanical ventilation rate and combined respectively. For rooms with ACHvent of less than 15, accumulated aerosol particles could not be removed by ventilation alone in 30 minutes. The PAC accelerated aerosol removal and reduced aerosol accumulation, and with the use of the PAC in addition to ventilation, accumulated aerosols were removed completely in 4-12 minutes. The PAC was shown to be more beneficial in rooms with poor ventilation and the added effectiveness of the PAC in aerosol removal was inversely correlated with the ACHvent by ventilation.Conclusions Although the air change rate differed considerably among dental surgeries, this study suggests that the addition of the PAC with a HEPA filter significantly increased aerosol removal and lessened aerosol accumulation, particularly in rooms with low ventilation rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.