Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34172901›Full record

ArticleEvidence-based dentistry2021

Could dentists be the first to diagnose COVID-19 due to oral manifestations?

Yasmine Coll, Fatima Elmahgoub

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in Evidence-based dentistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Resurgence of mucormycosis during COVID-19 pandemic.Oral and maxillofacial surgery cases · 2022
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yasmine CollDCT2, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Crosshouse Hospital, Kilmarnock, UK.
Fatima ElmahgoubDCT3, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Crosshouse Hospital, Kilmarnock, UK.
University Hospital Crosshouse · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Data sources A search of electronic databases (PubMed and Google Scholar) was carried out, with publication being set from 2019 to October 2020.Study selection Titles and abstracts from the original search were reviewed by two reviewers independently. Overall, 17 studies were included in the final analysis.Data extraction and synthesis Data extraction was conducted independently by two reviewers. Studies that were chosen were examined and the following data parameters were included: age and gender, COVID-19 polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test, COVID-19 manifestations, treatment for COVID-19, cutaneous lesions, oral manifestations, days after COVID-19 diagnosis, treat/healing or oral symptoms.Results Seventeen studies were included; 14 articles were case reports, two case series and one systematic review. The results showed that dry mouth, dysgeusia, oral ulcerations and opportunistic infections were among the most common oral manifestations expressed in COVID-19-positive patients.Conclusion The authors recommended carrying out careful clinical intraoral examinations on both COVID-19-positive patients or any patients requiring dental care, as oral symptoms can still be the only or initial symptom of COVID-19.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 TestingDentistsFalse Negative ReactionsHumansSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID34172901
PMCPMC8226347
OpenAlexW3175330554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.