Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34172871›Full record

ArticleBritish dental journal2021

Dentistry and aviation engineering - behind the scenes at operations in a UK-based airline.

Mohammed Dungarwalla, Edmund Bailey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British dental journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mohammed DungarwallaInstitute of Dentistry, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK; Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, The Royal London Hospital, Whitechapel, London, UK. m.dungarwalla@qmul.ac.uk.
Edmund BaileyInstitute of Dentistry, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK; Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, The Royal London Hospital, Whitechapel, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The healthcare industry is commonly compared to the aviation industry with emphasis on human factors and the decision-making processes undertaken by pilots and clinicians alike. The authors have been given exclusive access to meet the head of the maintenance team behind one of the UK's most popular airlines. An open-ended interview took place which was audio-transcribed for thematic analysis. Data were initially coded to identify basic patterns in the transcript. Once this was completed, themes were identified and agreed between the authors which could be compared to healthcare and dentistry. These themes were: regulation, occupational health, maintenance of equipment, use of checklists, reporting, just culture, burnout and disturbances.The aviation engineering industry requires the combination of a skilled workforce working under time pressure often in a financially restricted environment in a similar way to healthcare, especially dentistry. The two industries share common risks, although introduction of risk management tools such as checklists have been prevalent in aviation since the 1930s. Recognition of said risks and themes can lead to shared learning opportunities to benefit both sectors.

Indexed as

AviationBurnout, ProfessionalDentistryHumansRisk ManagementUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID34172871
PMCPMC8232987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.