ArticleScientific reports2021
Quantitative assessment of intraneural vascular alterations in peripheral nerve trauma using high-resolution neurosonography: technical note.
Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- What Is the Sequence of Mechanical and Structural Failure During Stretch Injury in the Rat Median Nerve? The Neuroclasis Classification.Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
High-resolution neurosonography (HRNS) has become a major imaging modality in assessment of peripheral nerve trauma in the recent years. However, the vascular changes of traumatic lesions have not been quantitatively assessed in HRNS. Here, we describe the vascular-ratio, a novel HRNS-based quantitative parameter for the assessment of intraneural vascular alterations in patients with nerve lesions. N = 9 patients suffering from peripheral nerve trauma were examined clinically, electrophysiologically and with HRNS (SonoSite Exporte, Fuji). Image analyses using Fiji included determination of the established fascicular ratio (FR), the cross-section ratio (CSR), and as an extension, the calculation of a vascular ratio (VR) of the healthy versus damaged nerve and a muscle perfusion ratio (MPR) in comparison to a healthy control group. The mean VR in the healthy part of the affected nerve (14.14%) differed significantly (p < 0.0001) from the damaged part (VR of 43.26%). This coincides with significant differences in the FR and CSR calculated for the damaged part versus the healthy part and the controls. In comparison, there was no difference between VRs determined for the healthy part of the affected nerve and the healthy controls (14.14% / 17.72%). However, the MPR of denervated muscles was significantly decreased compared to the non-affected contralateral controls. VR and MPR serve as additional tools in assessing peripheral nerve trauma. Image analysis and calculation are feasible. Combined with the more morphologic FR and CSR, the VR and MPR provide a more detailed insight into alterations accompanying nerve trauma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.