Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34172735›Full record

ArticleNature communications2021

Barrel cortex plasticity after photothrombotic stroke involves potentiating responses of pre-existing circuits but not functional remapping to new circuits.

William A Zeiger, Máté Marosi, Satvir Saggi, Natalie Noble, Isa Samad, Carlos Portera-Cailliau

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Brain repair mechanisms after cell therapy for stroke.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Rethinking Remapping: Circuit Mechanisms of Recovery after Stroke.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

William A ZeigerDepartment of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA. wzeiger@mednet.ucla.edu.
Máté MarosiDepartment of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Satvir SaggiDepartment of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4511-367X
Natalie NobleDepartment of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Isa SamadDepartment of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Carlos Portera-CailliauDepartment of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA. CPCailliau@mednet.ucla.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-5735-6380
University of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

UCLA IDDRC: Translational CoreP50HD103557 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI SUSAN Y BOOKHEIMER · 2020 to 2026
$9.6M
Translational Neuroscience Training GrantR25NS065723 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI CARMICHAEL, STANLEY THOMAS · 2009 to 2023
$2.8M
Mechanisms of structural neuronal plasticity and functional remapping after strokR01NS076942 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI PORTERA-CAILLIAU, CARLOS · 2013 to 2017
$1.7M
NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD103557NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS076942NINDS NIH HHS R25 NS065723
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recovery after stroke is thought to be mediated by adaptive circuit plasticity, whereby surviving neurons assume the roles of those that died. However, definitive longitudinal evidence of neurons changing their response selectivity after stroke is lacking. We sought to directly test whether such functional "remapping" occurs within mouse primary somatosensory cortex after a stroke that destroys the C1 barrel. Using in vivo calcium imaging to longitudinally record sensory-evoked activity under light anesthesia, we did not find any increase in the number of C1 whisker-responsive neurons in the adjacent, spared D3 barrel after stroke. To promote plasticity after stroke, we also plucked all whiskers except C1 (forced use therapy). This led to an increase in the reliability of sensory-evoked responses in C1 whisker-responsive neurons but did not increase the number of C1 whisker-responsive neurons in spared surround barrels over baseline levels. Our results argue against remapping of functionality after barrel cortex stroke, but support a circuit-based mechanism for how rehabilitation may improve recovery.

Indexed as

AnimalsCalciumEvoked Potentials, SomatosensoryFemaleMaleMice, TransgenicMolecular ImagingNeuronal PlasticityNeuronsSomatosensory CortexStrokeThrombosisVibrissaeCalcium

Identifiers

PMID34172735
PMCPMC8233353
OpenAlexW3175558326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.