Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34172106›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS2021

Reuse of Disposable Isolation Gowns in Rodent Facilities during a Pandemic.

Toi A Collins, Amanda E Sparks, Mary M Walker, Lon V Kendall, Karen M Dobos, Valerie K Bergdall, Judy M Hickman-Davis

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Toi A CollinsUniversity Laboratory Animal Resources, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Amanda E SparksUniversity Laboratory Animal Resources, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Mary M WalkerUniversity Laboratory Animal Resources, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Lon V KendallDepartment of Laboratory Animal Resources, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado.
Karen M DobosDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado.
Valerie K BergdallUniversity Laboratory Animal Resources, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Judy M Hickman-DavisUniversity Laboratory Animal Resources, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio;, Email: hickman-davis.2@osu.edu.
The Ohio State University · USColorado State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reuse of disposable personal protective equipment is traditionally discouraged, yet in times of heightened medical applications such as the SARS CoV-2 pandemic, it can be difficult to obtain. In this article we examine the reuse of disposable gowns with respect to still providing personnel protection. XR7, a fluorescent powder, was used to track contamination of gowns after manipulation of rodent cages. Mouse cages were treated with XR7 prior to manipulations. Disposable gowns were labeled for single person use and hung in common procedure spaces within the vivarium between usages. A simulated rack change of 140 cages was completed using XR7-treated cages. One individual changed all cages with a break occurring after the first 70 cages, requiring the gown to be removed and reused once. To simulate research activities, 5 individuals accessed 3 XR7-treated cages daily for 5 d. Each mouse in the XR7-treated cages was manipulated at least once before returning cages to the housing room. Disposable gowns were reused 5 times per individual. Gowns, gloves, clothing, bare arms, and hands were scanned for fluorescence before and after removing PPE. Fluorescence was localized to gloves and gown sleeves in closest contact with animals and caging. No fluorescence was detected on underlying clothing, or bare arms and hands after removing PPE. Fluorescence was not detected in procedure spaces where gowns were hung. The lack of fluorescence on personnel or surfaces indicate that gowns can be reused 1 time for routine husbandry tasks and up to 5 times for research personnel. A method for decontamination of used gowns using Vaporized Hydrogen Peroxide (VHP) was also validated for use in areas where animals are considered high risk such as quarantine, or for fragile immunocompromised rodent colonies.

Indexed as

Animals, LaboratoryDisposable EquipmentPandemicsProtective ClothingAnimalsAnimal TechniciansHealth PersonnelHousing, AnimalHumansMicePersonal Protective Equipment

Identifiers

PMID34172106
PMCPMC8483644
OpenAlexW3175664720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.