Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34172075›Full record

ArticleCancer & metabolism2021

Impaired anaplerosis is a major contributor to glycolysis inhibitor toxicity in glioma.

Sunada Khadka, Kenisha Arthur, Yasaman Barekatain, Eliot Behr, Mykia Washington, Jeffrey Ackroyd, Kaitlyn Crowley, Pornpa Suriyamongkol, Yu-Hsi Lin, Cong-Dat Pham and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer & metabolism, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. BeyondMolecular therapy oncolytics · 2023
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sunada KhadkaDepartment of Cancer Systems Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Kenisha ArthurDepartment of Cancer Systems Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Yasaman BarekatainDepartment of Cancer Systems Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Eliot BehrDepartment of Cancer Systems Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Mykia WashingtonDepartment of Cancer Systems Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Jeffrey AckroydDepartment of Cancer Systems Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Kaitlyn CrowleyDepartment of Cancer Systems Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Pornpa SuriyamongkolDepartment of Cancer Systems Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Yu-Hsi LinDepartment of Cancer Systems Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Cong-Dat PhamDepartment of Cancer Systems Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Rafal ZielinskiDepartment of Experimental Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Marissa TrujilloDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, College of Pharmacy, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
James GalliganDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, College of Pharmacy, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Dimitra K GeorgiouDepartment of Cancer Systems Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
John AsaraDepartment of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Florian MullerSPOROS Bioventures, Houston, TX, USA. aettius@aol.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7568-2948
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity of Arizona · USBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USBioVentures (United States) · US

Funding

SOUTHWEST ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES CENTERP30ES006694 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI DEAN BILLHEIMER · 1994 to 2026
$36.7M
Training in Environmental Toxicology of Human DiseaseT32ES007091 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI Nathan J Cherrington · 1985 to 2026
$10.7M
Collateral Deletions Expose Targetable Metabolic Vulnerabilities in the PTEN locusR21CA226301 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI MULLER, FLORIAN · 2018 to 2019
$378k
American Cancer Society RSG-15-145-01-CDDCPRIT RP170067Elsa U. Pardee Foundation NANational Comprehensive Cancer Network YIA170032NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES006694NIEHS NIH HHS T32 ES007091NIH HHS CDP SPORE P50CA127001-07NIH HHS R21CA226301NIH HHS SPORE 2P50CA127001-11A1The Larry Deaven Fellowship NAUncle Kory Foundation (US) NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundReprogramming of metabolic pathways is crucial to satisfy the bioenergetic and biosynthetic demands and maintain the redox status of rapidly proliferating cancer cells. In tumors, the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle generates biosynthetic intermediates and must be replenished (anaplerosis), mainly from pyruvate and glutamine. We recently described a novel enolase inhibitor, HEX, and its pro-drug POMHEX. Since glycolysis inhibition would deprive the cell of a key source of pyruvate, we hypothesized that enolase inhibitors might inhibit anaplerosis and synergize with other inhibitors of anaplerosis, such as the glutaminase inhibitor, CB-839.

methodsWe analyzed polar metabolites in sensitive (ENO1-deleted) and resistant (ENO1-WT) glioma cells treated with enolase and glutaminase inhibitors. We investigated whether sensitivity to enolase inhibitors could be attenuated by exogenous anaplerotic metabolites. We also determined the synergy between enolase inhibitors and the glutaminase inhibitor CB-839 in glioma cells in vitro and in vivo in both intracranial and subcutaneous tumor models.

resultsMetabolomic profiling of ENO1-deleted glioma cells treated with the enolase inhibitor revealed a profound decrease in the TCA cycle metabolites with the toxicity reversible upon exogenous supplementation of supraphysiological levels of anaplerotic substrates, including pyruvate. ENO1-deleted cells also exhibited selective sensitivity to the glutaminase inhibitor CB-839, in a manner rescuable by supplementation of anaplerotic substrates or plasma-like media Plasmax

conclusionTogether, these data suggest that at least for ENO1-deleted gliomas, tumors in vivo-unlike cells in culture-show limited dependence on glutaminolysis and instead primarily depend on glycolysis for anaplerosis. Our findings reinforce the previously reported metabolic idiosyncrasies of in vitro culture and suggest that cell culture media nutrient composition more faithful to the in vivo environment will more accurately predict in vivo efficacy of metabolism targeting drugs.

Indexed as

AnaplerosisCancer metabolismCB-839Collateral lethalityEnolase inhibitorGlutaminolysisGlycolysisPOMHEX

Identifiers

PMID34172075
PMCPMC8228515
OpenAlexW3116148213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.