Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34172066›Full record

ArticleHealth research policy and systems2021

Can intersectionality help with understanding and tackling health inequalities? Perspectives of professional stakeholders.

Daniel Holman, Sarah Salway, Andrew Bell, Brian Beach, Adewale Adebajo, Nuzhat Ali, Jabeer Butt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health research policy and systems, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Access to bariatric surgery in Aotearoa, New Zealand - a scoping review.International journal for equity in health · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. No Ethics Needed? Towards an Ethics of Care for Public and Patient Involvement and Engagement.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Review
  15. Intersectionality-Informed HIV Cure-Related Research at the End of Life: A Call to Action.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Daniel HolmanDepartment of Sociological Studies, University of Sheffield, Elmfield building, Northumberland Road, Sheffield, S10 2TU, United Kingdom. daniel.holman@sheffield.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4134-6238
Sarah SalwayDepartment of Sociological Studies, University of Sheffield, Elmfield building, Northumberland Road, Sheffield, S10 2TU, United Kingdom.
Andrew BellSheffield Methods Institute, Interdisciplinary Centre of the Social Sciences, University of Sheffield, 219 Portobello, Sheffield, S1 4DP, United Kingdom.
Brian BeachInternational Longevity Centre-UK. Vintage House, 36-37 Albert Embankment, Vauxhall, London, SE1 7TL, United Kingdom.
Adewale AdebajoCentre for Assistive Technology and Connected Healthcare, University of Sheffield, 217 Portobello, Sheffield, S1 4DP, United Kingdom.
Nuzhat AliPublic Health England. Seaton House, City Link, Nottingham, NG2 4LA, United Kingdom.
Jabeer ButtRace Equality Foundation, 27 Greenwood Pl, Kentish Town, London, NW5 1LB, United Kingdom.

Funding

Economic and Social Research Council ES/R00921X/1School for Public Health Research PD-SPH-2015-10025
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe concept of "intersectionality" is increasingly employed within public health arenas, particularly in North America, and is often heralded as offering great potential to advance health inequalities research and action. Given persistently poor progress towards tackling health inequalities, and recent calls to reframe this agenda in the United Kingdom and Europe, the possible contribution of intersectionality deserves attention. Yet, no existing research has examined professional stakeholder understandings and perspectives on applying intersectionality to this field.

methodsIn this paper we seek to address that gap, drawing upon a consultation survey and face-to-face workshop (n = 23) undertaken in the United Kingdom. The survey included both researchers (n = 53) and policy and practice professionals (n = 20) with varied roles and levels of engagement in research and evaluation. Topics included familiarity with the term and concept "intersectionality", relevance to health inequalities work, and issues shaping its uptake. Respondents were also asked to comment on two specific policy suggestions: intersectionally targeting and tailoring interventions, and evaluating the intersectional effects of policies. The workshop aims were to share examples of applying intersectionality within health inequalities research and practice; understand the views of research and practice colleagues on potential contributions and challenges; and identify potential ways to promote intersectional approaches.

resultsFindings indicated a generally positive response to the concept and a cautiously optimistic assessment that intersectional approaches could be valuable. However, opinions were mixed and various challenges were raised, especially around whether intersectionality research is necessarily critical and transformative and, accordingly, how it should be operationalized methodologically. Nonetheless, there was general agreement that intersectionality is concerned with diverse inequalities and the systems of power that shape them.

conclusionsWe position intersectionality within the wider context of health inequalities policy and practice, suggesting potential ways forward for the approach in the context of the United Kingdom. The views of policy and practice professionals suggest that intersectionality has far to travel to help counter individualistic narratives and to encourage an approach that is sensitive to subgroup inequalities and the processes that generate them. Examples of promising practice, albeit mostly in North America, suggest that it is possible for intersectionality to gain traction.

Indexed as

Health PolicyHealth Status DisparitiesEuropeHumansNorth AmericaUnited KingdomCo-productionEvidence-based policyHealth inequalitiesHealth policyIntersectionalityStakeholder engagementSurveyUKWorkshop

Identifiers

PMID34172066
PMCPMC8227357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.