Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34172030›Full record

ArticleBMC palliative care2021

Facilitating advance care planning in the general practice setting for patients with a chronic, life-limiting illness: protocol for a phase-III cluster-randomized controlled trial and process evaluation of the ACP-GP intervention.

Julie Stevens, Peter Pype, Kim Eecloo, Luc Deliens, Koen Pardon, Aline De Vleminck

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC palliative care, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Complex advance care planning intervention in general practice (ACP-GP): a cluster-randomised controlled trial.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2024
    Trial
  4. Advance care planning engagement in patients with chronic, life-limiting illness: baseline findings from a cluster-randomised controlled trial in primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2023
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Julie StevensVrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) & Ghent University, End-of-life Care Research Group, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090, Brussels, Belgium. julie.joseph.stevens@vub.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1417-0436
Peter PypeVrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) & Ghent University, End-of-life Care Research Group, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090, Brussels, Belgium.
Kim EeclooVrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) & Ghent University, End-of-life Care Research Group, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090, Brussels, Belgium.
Luc DeliensVrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) & Ghent University, End-of-life Care Research Group, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090, Brussels, Belgium.
Koen Pardon *Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) & Ghent University, End-of-life Care Research Group, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090, Brussels, Belgium.
Aline De Vleminck *Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) & Ghent University, End-of-life Care Research Group, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090, Brussels, Belgium.
Vrije Universiteit Brussel · BE

Funding

Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 196250/11B6220N
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdvance care planning (ACP), a process of communication about patients' preferences for future medical care, should be initiated in a timely manner. Ideally situated for this initiation is the general practitioner (GP). The intervention to improve the initiation of ACP for patients with a chronic life-limiting illness in general practice (ACP-GP) includes an ACP workbook for patients, ACP communication training for GPs, planned ACP conversations, and documentation of ACP conversation outcomes in a structured template. We present the study protocol of a Phase-III randomized controlled trial (RCT) of ACP-GP that aims to evaluate its effects on outcomes at the GP, patient, and surrogate decision maker (SDM) levels; and to assess the implementation process of the intervention.

methodsThis RCT will take place in Flanders, Belgium. Thirty-six GPs, 108 patients with a chronic, life-limiting illness, and their (potential) SDM will be recruited, then cluster-randomized to the ACP-GP intervention or the control condition. The primary outcome for GPs is ACP self-efficacy; primary outcome for patients is level of ACP engagement. Secondary outcomes for GPs are ACP practices, knowledge and attitudes; and documentation of ACP discussion outcomes. Secondary outcomes for patients are quality of life; anxiety; depression; appointment of an SDM; completion of new ACP documents; thinking about ACP; and communication with the GP. The secondary outcome for the SDM is level of engagement with ACP. A process evaluation will assess the recruitment and implementation of the intervention using the RE-AIM framework. DISCUSSION: While the general practice setting holds promise for timely initiation of ACP, there is a lack of randomized trial studies evaluating the effectiveness of ACP interventions implemented in this setting. After this Phase-III RCT, we will be able to present valuable evidence of the effects of this ACP-GP intervention, with the potential for offering a well-tested and evaluated program to be implemented in general practice. The results of the process evaluation will provide insight into what contributes to or detracts from implementation success, as well as how the intervention can be adapted to specific contexts or needs.

trial registrationProspectively registered at with ISRCTN ( ISRCTN12995230 ); registered 19/06/2020.

Indexed as

Advance Care PlanningGeneral PracticeGeneral PractitionersChronic DiseaseCommunicationHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAdvance care planningCommunicationComplex interventionGeneral practicePhase IIIProcess evaluationRandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID34172030
PMCPMC8231078
OpenAlexW3176870560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.