Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34172027›Full record

SynthesisBMC public health2021

Adolescent condom use in Southern Africa: narrative systematic review and conceptual model of multilevel barriers and facilitators.

Áine Aventin, Sarah Gordon, Christina Laurenzi, Stephan Rabie, Mark Tomlinson, Maria Lohan, Jackie Stewart, Allen Thurston, Lynne Lohfeld, G J Melendez-Torres and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
13.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Factors influencing premarital risky sexual behavior likelihood and human papilloma virus knowledge among young women: A cross-sectional study.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Áine AventinSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK. a.aventin@qub.ac.uk.
Sarah GordonInstitute for Life Course Health Research, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
Christina LaurenziInstitute for Life Course Health Research, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
Stephan RabieInstitute for Life Course Health Research, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
Mark TomlinsonSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK.
Maria LohanSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK.
Jackie StewartInstitute for Life Course Health Research, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
Allen ThurstonSchool of Education, Social Sciences, Education and Social Work, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland.
Lynne LohfeldCentre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland.
G J Melendez-TorresCollege of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, England, UK.
Moroesi MakhethaInstitute for Life Course Health Research, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
Yeukai ChideyaInstitute for Life Course Health Research, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
Sarah SkeenInstitute for Life Course Health Research, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
Stellenbosch University · ZAQueen's University Belfast · GBPerinatal HIV Research Unit · ZAUniversity of Exeter · GBWorld Vision · US

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/T040246/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdolescent HIV and pregnancy rates in Southern Africa are amongst the highest in the world. Despite decades of sexual and reproductive health (SRH) programming targeting adolescents, recent trends suggest there is a continued need for interventions targeting condom use for this age group.

methodsThis review synthesises evidence from qualitative studies that describe the determinants of condom use among adolescents in Southern Africa. We conducted systematic searches in four databases. Data were extracted, appraised for quality and analysed using a 'best-fit' framework synthesis approach.

resultsWe coded deductively findings from 23 original studies using an a priori framework and subsequently conducted thematic analysis. Synthesised findings produced six key themes relating to: 1) pervasive unequal gender norms and restrictive masculinities favouring male sexual decision-making and stigmatising condom use in committed relationships; 2) other social norms reflecting negative constructions of adolescent sexuality and non-traditional family planning; 3) economic and political barriers including poverty and a lack of policy support for condom use; 4) service-level barriers including a lack of youth-friendly SRH services and comprehensive sex education in schools; 5) interpersonal barriers and facilitators including unequal power dynamics in sexual partnerships, peer influences and encouraging condoning condom use, and inadequate communication about SRH from parents/caregivers; and 6) negative attitudes and beliefs about condoms and condom use among adolescents. A conceptual model was generated to describe determinants of condom use, illustrating individual-, interpersonal- and structural-level barriers and facilitating factors.

conclusionSRH programming targeting barriers and facilitators of condom use at multiple levels is recommended in Southern Africa. We present a multilevel integrated model of barriers and facilitators to guide adolescent SRH decision-making, programme planning and evaluation. Given the existence of multilevel barriers and facilitators, interventions should, likewise, take a multilevel approach that incorporates locally relevant understanding of the individual-, interpersonal- and structural-level barriers and facilitators to condom use among adolescents in the region.

Indexed as

CondomsSafe SexAdolescentAfrica, SouthernFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMalePregnancySex EducationSexual BehaviorAdolescent healthAdolescentsCondom useSexual and reproductive healthSouthern AfricaSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID34172027
PMCPMC8234649
OpenAlexW3176967452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.