Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34172016›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2021

Design preferences for global scale: a mixed-methods study of "glocalization" of an animated, video-based health communication intervention.

Maya Adam, Rachel P Chase, Shannon A McMahon, Kira-Leigh Kuhnert, Jamie Johnston, Victoria Ward, Charles Prober, Till Bärnighausen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Maya AdamDepartment of Pediatrics, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA. madam@stanford.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-5563-421X
Rachel P ChaseIndependent Researcher, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Shannon A McMahonHeidelberg Institute of Global Health at the Faculty of Medicine, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Kira-Leigh KuhnertDigital Medic South Africa, Stanford University Center for Health Education, Stanford, California, USA.
Jamie JohnstonStanford University Center for Health Education, Stanford, California, USA.
Victoria WardDepartment of Pediatrics, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Charles Prober *Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Till Bärnighausen *Heidelberg Institute of Global Health at the Faculty of Medicine, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Stanford Health Care · USHeidelberg University · DEJohns Hopkins University · USStanford Medicine · US

Funding

ELMA Foundation 18-F0016
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDesigning health communication interventions for global scaling promotes health literacy and facilitates rapid global health messaging. Limited literature explores preferences for animation prototypes and other content characteristics across participants in different global regions. Prior research underscores an urgent need for health communication interventions that are compelling and accessible across culturally and geographically diverse audiences. This study presents feedback from global learners on animation design preferences and other key considerations for the development of educational video content intended for global adaptation and scaling.

methodsWe used a mixed-methods, sequential explanatory design, with a qualitative descriptive approach to the analysis of the qualitative data. We recruited participants from an international group of learners enrolled in a massive open online course. Through an online quantitative survey (n = 330), we sought preferences from participants in 73 countries for animation design prototypes to be used in video-based health communication interventions. To learn more about these preferences, we conducted in-depth interviews (n = 20) with participants selected using maximum variation purposive sampling.

resultsGenerally, respondents were willing to accept animation prototypes that were free of cultural and ethnic identifiers and believed these to be preferable for globally scalable health communication videos. Diverse representations of age, gender roles, and family structure were also preferred and felt to support inclusive messaging across cultures and global regions. Familiar-sounding voiceovers using local languages, dialects, and accents were preferred for enhancing local resonance. Across global regions, narratives were highlighted as a compelling approach to facilitating engagement and participants preferred short videos with no more than two or three health messages.

conclusionsOur findings suggest that global learners may be willing to accept simplified visuals, designed for broad cross-cultural acceptability, especially if the content is localized in other ways, such as through the use of locally resonating narratives and voiceovers. Diverse, inclusive portrayals of age, gender roles and family structure were preferred.

Indexed as

Communications MediaHealth CommunicationHealth LiteracyHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesCommunity health promotionGlobal healthHealth communicationHealth educationHealth literacyHuman-centered design

Identifiers

PMID34172016
PMCPMC8226350
OpenAlexW3113622265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.