Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34172002›Full record

Observational studyBMC neurology2021

The impact of tube replacement timing during LCIG therapy on PEG-J associated adverse events: a retrospective multicenter observational study.

Kanefumi Yamashita, Yukinori Yube, Yukinao Yamazaki, Takehide Fukuchi, Masaki Kato, Tomoyuki Koike, Takeshi Uehara, Yoshiou Ikeda, Satoshi Furune, Hidehiro Murakami and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC neurology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Transgastric Jejunostomy (PEG-J) for Continuous Infusion of Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel: An Approach for Parkinson's Disease Treatment.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2023
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 12 institutions in 1 country.

Kanefumi YamashitaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Seizan-Kai Kawaminami Hospital, Kawaminami-cho, Kawaminami 18150-47, Koyu-gun, Miyazaki, 889-1301, Japan. kanefumi0519@yahoo.co.jp.
Yukinori YubeDepartment of Gastroenterology and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Juntendo University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Yukinao YamazakiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Fukui Red Cross Hospital, Fukui, Japan.
Takehide FukuchiDivision of Endoscopy, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Kanagawa, Japan.
Masaki KatoDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, St Marianna University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan.
Tomoyuki KoikeDivision of Gastroenterology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Miyagi, Japan.
Takeshi UeharaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, Saitama, Japan.
Yoshiou IkedaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Metabology, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Ehime, Japan.
Satoshi FuruneDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Hidehiro MurakamiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Saiseikai Matsuyama Hospital, Ehime, Japan.
Eiji KubotaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.
Shinsuke FujiokaDepartment of Neurology, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Yoshinori SatoDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, St Marianna University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan.
Xiaoyi JinDivision of Gastroenterology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Miyagi, Japan.
Tomohiko SuzukiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Kazuhiro FurukawaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Yoshio TsuboiDepartment of Neurology, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Nagoya University · JPFukuoka University · JPSt. Marianna University School of Medicine · JPTohoku University · JPEhime University · JPFukui Red Cross Hospital · JPJichi Medical University · JPJuntendo University Hospital · JPMiwa Hospital · JPNagoya City University · JPSaiseikai Matsuyama Hospital · JPYokohama City University Medical Center · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLevodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel (LCIG) treatment, a unique drug delivery system for patients with advanced Parkinson's disease (PD), is covered by health insurance in Japan since September 2016. Various LCIG procedure/device-associated adverse events (AEs) have been reported; however, reports on their treatment have been limited. This is the first multicenter study to clarify the frequency and timing of device-related AEs.

methodsBetween September 2016 and December 2018, 104 patients introduced to the LCIG treatment for advanced PD in 11 hospitals were included. The patients' characteristics, AEs incidence, AEs time, and tube exchange time were investigated.

resultsThe median follow-up period was 21.5 months. Minor AE cases were 29.4%, whereas major AE cases were 43.1%. Majority of major AEs (n = 55, 94.8%) were managed with endoscopic treatment, such as tube exchange. Few severe AEs required surgical treatment (n =3, 5.2%). The mean (range) exposure to percutaneous endoscopic gastrojejunostomy (PEG-J) was 14.7 (0-33) months. One year after the LCIG treatment introduction, 55 patients (54.0%) retained the original PEG-J tube. The mean PEG-J tube exchange time was 10.8 ± 7.0 months in all patients, 11.6 ± 4.7 and 10.5 ± 7.7 months in patients with scheduled exchange and who underwent exchange due to AEs, respectively.

conclusionsSome device-related AEs occurred during the LCIG treatment; however, only few were serious, most of which could be treated with simple procedures or tube replacement with endoscopy. Therefore, the LCIG treatment is feasible and safe and is a unique treatment option for PD, requiring endoscopists' understanding and cooperation.

Indexed as

Antiparkinson AgentsCarbidopaGastric BypassGelsLevodopaDrug CombinationsHumansParkinson DiseaseRetrospective StudiesAntiparkinson AgentsCarbidopacarbidopa, levodopa drug combinationDrug CombinationsGelsLevodopaLevodopa–carbidopa intestinal gelParkinson’s diseasePercutaneous endoscopic gastrojejunostomy

Identifiers

PMID34172002
PMCPMC8228941
OpenAlexW3135773712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.