Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34172000›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2021

MicroPIPE: validating an end-to-end workflow for high-quality complete bacterial genome construction.

Valentine Murigneux, Leah W Roberts, Brian M Forde, Minh-Duy Phan, Nguyen Thi Khanh Nhu, Adam D Irwin, Patrick N A Harris, David L Paterson, Mark A Schembri, David M Whiley and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Nanopore Sequencing for Chikungunya Virus: Principles and Application.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2027
    Article
  2. Whole genome sequencing analysis and functional characterization of Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus HP-B1083.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Complete genome sequence ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2025
    Article
  8. Genome size estimation from long read overlaps.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025
    Article
  9. Complete genome sequences ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Comprehensive Safety Assessment ofCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. High-riskeLife · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Complete genome sequences of 11Microbiology resource announcements · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Comparative genomics of symbioticMicrobial genomics · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Valentine Murigneux *QCIF Facility for Advanced Bioinformatics, Institute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1235-9462
Leah W Roberts *University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. leah@ebi.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1024-0564
Brian M FordeUniversity of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2264-4785
Minh-Duy PhanSchool of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3426-1044
Nguyen Thi Khanh NhuSchool of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0158-850X
Adam D IrwinUniversity of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8974-6789
Patrick N A HarrisUniversity of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2895-0345
David L PatersonUniversity of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2079-4437
Mark A SchembriSchool of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4863-9260
David M WhileyUniversity of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5969-3161
Scott A BeatsonSchool of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. scott.beatson@uq.edu.au.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1806-3283

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOxford Nanopore Technology (ONT) long-read sequencing has become a popular platform for microbial researchers due to the accessibility and affordability of its devices. However, easy and automated construction of high-quality bacterial genomes using nanopore reads remains challenging. Here we aimed to create a reproducible end-to-end bacterial genome assembly pipeline using ONT in combination with Illumina sequencing.

resultsWe evaluated the performance of several popular tools used during genome reconstruction, including base-calling, filtering, assembly, and polishing. We also assessed overall genome accuracy using ONT both natively and with Illumina. All steps were validated using the high-quality complete reference genome for the Escherichia coli sequence type (ST)131 strain EC958. Software chosen at each stage were incorporated into our final pipeline, MicroPIPE. Further validation of MicroPIPE was carried out using 11 additional ST131 E. coli isolates, which demonstrated that complete circularised chromosomes and plasmids could be achieved without manual intervention. Twelve publicly available Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacterial genomes (with available raw ONT data and matched complete genomes) were also assembled using MicroPIPE. We found that revised basecalling and updated assembly of the majority of these genomes resulted in improved accuracy compared to the current publicly available complete genomes.

conclusionsMicroPIPE is built in modules using Singularity container images and the bioinformatics workflow manager Nextflow, allowing changes and adjustments to be made in response to future tool development. Overall, MicroPIPE provides an easy-access, end-to-end solution for attaining high-quality bacterial genomes. MicroPIPE is available at https://github.com/BeatsonLab-MicrobialGenomics/micropipe .

Indexed as

Escherichia coliGenome, BacterialComputational BiologyHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingSequence Analysis, DNAWorkflowAssemblyBacteriaNanoporeONTPipelinePolishingSequence

Identifiers

PMID34172000
PMCPMC8235852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.