Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34171973›Full record

Trial reportCephalalgia : an international journal of headache2021

Randomised, controlled trial of erenumab for the prevention of episodic migraine in patients from Asia, the Middle East, and Latin America: The EMPOwER study.

Shuu-Jiun Wang, Artemio A Roxas, Bibiana Saravia, Byung-Kun Kim, Debashish Chowdhury, Naji Riachi, Mei-Ling Sharon Tai, Surat Tanprawate, Tai Tran Ngoc, Yi Jing Zhao and 6 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Guideline
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Guideline
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Article
  15. Drugs for Migraine Prophylaxis.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2026
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 13 institutions in 11 countries.

Shuu-Jiun WangNeurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-5179-5358
Artemio A RoxasThe Medical City, Pasig, Philippines.
Bibiana SaraviaMautalen Salud e Investigación, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Byung-Kun KimDepartment of Neurology, Nowon Eulji Medical Center, Eulji University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Debashish ChowdhuryDepartment of Neurology, G B Pant Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research, New Delhi, India.
Naji RiachiLebanese American University Medical Center Rizk Hospital, Beirut, Lebanon.ORCID 0000-0002-8652-9698
Mei-Ling Sharon TaiUniversity of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Surat TanprawateMaharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Tai Tran NgocUniversity Medical Center, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Yi Jing ZhaoNational Neuroscience Institute - Singapore General Hospital Campus, Singapore.
Daniel D MikolAmgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
Shaloo PandhiNovartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Shihua WenNovartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, USA.
Subhayan MondalNovartis Healthcare Pvt. Ltd., Hyderabad, India.ORCID 0000-0001-7267-8505
Nadia TenenbaumNovartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, USA.
Peggy Hours-ZesigerNovartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Novartis (Switzerland) · CHNovartis (United States) · USAmgen (United States) · USEulji University · KRHelios Salud · ARInstitute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research · INMaharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital · THNational Yang Ming Chiao Tung University · TWNovartis (India) · INSingapore General Hospital · SGUniversity Medical Center Rizk Hospital · LBUniversity of Asia and the Pacific · PHUniversity of Malaya · MY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveEMPOwER, a double-blind, randomised, phase 3 study, evaluated the efficacy and safety of erenumab in adults with episodic migraine from Asia, the Middle East, and Latin America.

methodsRandomised patients (N = 900) received monthly subcutaneous injections of placebo, erenumab 70 mg, or 140 mg (3:3:2) for 3 months. Primary endpoint was change from baseline in monthly migraine days at Month 3. Other endpoints included achievement of ≥50%, ≥75%, and 100% reduction in monthly migraine days, change in monthly acute migraine-specific medication treatment days, patient-reported outcomes, and safety assessment.

resultsAt baseline, mean (standard deviation) age was 37.5 (9.9) years, 81.9% were women, and monthly migraine days was 8.2 (2.8). At Month 3, change from baseline in monthly migraine days (primary endpoint) was -3.1, -4.2, and -4.8 days for placebo, erenumab 70 mg, and erenumab 140 mg, respectively, with a statistically significant difference for erenumab versus placebo (P = 0.002 [70 mg], P < 0.001 [140 mg]). Both erenumab doses were also significantly superior to placebo on all secondary endpoints, including the proportion of patients achieving ≥50% reduction from baseline in monthly migraine days, change from baseline in monthly acute migraine-specific medication treatment days and change from baseline in the Headache Impact Test-6™ scores. The safety profile of erenumab was comparable with placebo; no new safety signals were observed.

conclusionsThis study of erenumab in patients with episodic migraine from Asia, the Middle East, and Latin America met all primary and secondary endpoints. A consistent numerical benefit was observed with erenumab 140 mg versus erenumab 70 mg across all efficacy endpoints. These findings extend evidence of erenumab's efficacy and safety to patients under-represented in previous trials.

Indexed as

Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Receptor AntagonistsMigraine DisordersAdultAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAsiaDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansLatin AmericaMiddle EastTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedCalcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Receptor AntagonistserenumabAsiacalcitonin gene-related peptideepisodic migraineerenumabLatin Americarandomised controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID34171973
PMCPMC8592099
OpenAlexW3176839476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.