Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34171822›Full record

Trial reportDrug and alcohol dependence2021

Evaluating N-acetylcysteine for early and end-of-treatment abstinence in adult cigarette smokers.

Erin A McClure, Amy E Wahlquist, Rachel L Tomko, Nathaniel L Baker, Matthew J Carpenter, Elizabeth D Bradley, Patrick A Cato, Cassandra D Gipson, Kevin M Gray

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The neuroimmune-glutamate hypothesis of addiction.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Erin A McClureMedical University of South Carolina, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, 67 President St., MSC 861, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA; Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, 86 Jonathan Lucas St., Charleston, SC, 29425, USA. Electronic address: mccluree@musc.edu.
Amy E WahlquistEast Tennessee State University, Center for Rural Health Research, Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, 104 Lamb Hall, Johnson City, TN, 37612, USA.
Rachel L TomkoMedical University of South Carolina, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, 67 President St., MSC 861, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA.
Nathaniel L BakerMedical University of South Carolina, Department of Public Health Sciences, 135 Cannon St., Charleston, SC, 29425, USA.
Matthew J CarpenterMedical University of South Carolina, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, 67 President St., MSC 861, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA; Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, 86 Jonathan Lucas St., Charleston, SC, 29425, USA.
Elizabeth D BradleyMedical University of South Carolina, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, 67 President St., MSC 861, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA.
Patrick A CatoMedical University of South Carolina, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, 67 President St., MSC 861, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA.
Cassandra D GipsonDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of Kentucky, 2195 Harrodsburg Rd., Lexington, KY, 40504, USA.
Kevin M GrayMedical University of South Carolina, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, 67 President St., MSC 861, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA.
Medical University of South Carolina · USEast Tennessee State University · USUniversity of Kentucky · US

Funding

Translational Science Laboratory Shared ResourceP30CA138313 · NCI · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI John J Lemasters · 2009 to 2026
$42.7M
South Carolina Clinical & Translational Research Institute (SCTR)UL1TR001450 · NCATS · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI BRADY, KATHLEEN T., FLUME, PATRICK A · 2015 to 2024
$41.1M
Southern Consortium Node of the Clinical Trials Network (Varenicline)UG1DA013727 · NIDA · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI KATHLEEN T. BRADY, Kelly S. Barth · 2015 to 2026
$24.8M
Technological Innovations for the Remote Monitoring of Smoking in AdolescentsK01DA036739 · NIDA · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI MCCLURE, ERIN A · 2014 to 2018
$771k
Evaluating N-acetylcysteine as a pharmacotherapy for tobacco use disorderR34DA042228 · NIDA · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI MCCLURE, ERIN A · 2016 to 2018
$660k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001450NCI NIH HHS P30 CA138313NIDA NIH HHS K01 DA036739NIDA NIH HHS R34 DA042228NIDA NIH HHS UG1 DA013727
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is robust preclinical literature and preliminary clinical findings supporting the use of N-Acetylcysteine (NAC) to treat substance use disorders, including tobacco use disorder (TUD). However, randomized controlled trials have yielded mixed results and NAC's efficacy for TUD has not been established. The goals of this study were to assess the efficacy of NAC in promoting early and end-of-treatment abstinence and preventing relapse among adult smokers.

methodsThis randomized, double-blinded clinical trial enrolled adult, daily smokers (N = 114; ages 23-64; 51 % female; 65 % White; 29 % Black/African American; 7% Hispanic/Latinx), who were randomized 1:1 to receive NAC (n = 59) or placebo (n = 55) (1200 mg b.i.d.) for eight weeks. Participants received brief cessation counseling and incentives for abstinence during the first three days of the quit attempt. Primary outcomes: (i) carbon monoxide (CO)-confirmed abstinence during the first three days of the quit attempt. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: (ii) time to relapse; (iii) biologically confirmed abstinence at Week 8.

resultsNo differences were found between NAC and placebo groups on measures of early abstinence (3-day quit attempt; 11 % for NAC vs. 15 % for placebo; all p > 0.11), time to relapse (p = 0.19), and end-of-treatment abstinence (7% for NAC vs. 11 % for placebo; all p > 0.40].

conclusionsResults indicate that NAC is a well-tolerated pharmacotherapy but is unlikely to be efficacious as a monotherapy for TUD in adults. Considered in the collective context of other research, NAC may potentially be more useful in a younger population, as a combination pharmacotherapy, or in the presence of more intensive psychosocial treatment.

Indexed as

Smoking CessationTobacco ProductsTobacco Use DisorderAcetylcysteineAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSmokersYoung AdultAcetylcysteineAbstinenceGlutamateN-acetylcysteinePharmacotherapyRelapseSmoking cessationTobacco

Identifiers

PMID34171822
PMCPMC8282766
OpenAlexW3177048405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.