ArticleComputers in biology and medicine2021
Scat-NET: COVID-19 diagnosis with a CNN model using scattergram images.
Article in Computers in biology and medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- COFE-Net: An ensemble strategy for Computer-Aided Detection for COVID-19.Measurement : journal of the International Measurement Confederation · 2022Article
- Assessing population-sampling strategies for reducing the COVID-19 incidence.Computers in biology and medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The acute respiratory syndrome COVID-19 disease, which is caused by SARS-CoV-2, has infected many people over a short time and caused the death of more than 2 million people. The gold standard in detecting COVID-19 is to apply the reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test. This test has low sensitivity and produces false results of approximately 15%-20%. Computer tomography (CT) images were checked as a result of suspicious RT-PCR tests. If the virus is not infected in the lung, the virus is not observed on CT lung images. To overcome this problem, we propose a 25-depth convolutional neural network (CNN) model that uses scattergram images, which we call Scat-NET. Scattergram images are frequently used to reveal the numbers of neutrophils, eosinophils, basophils, lymphocytes and monocytes, which are measurements used in evaluating disease symptoms, and the relationships between them. To the best of our knowledge, using the CNN together with scattergram images in the detection of COVID-19 is the first study on this subject. Scattergram images obtained from 335 patients in total were classified using the Scat-NET architecture. The overall accuracy was 92.4%. The most striking finding in the results obtained was that COVID-19 patients with negative RT-PCR tests but positive CT test results were positive. As a result, we emphasize that the Scat-NET model will be an alternative to CT scans and could be applied as a secondary test for patients with negative RT-PCR tests.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.