ArticleJournal of pediatric nursing
Impact of COVID-19 on Pediatric Clinical Research.
Article in Journal of pediatric nursing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- A pilot randomized trial of ketamine for suicidal ideation in a pediatric emergency department.CJEM · 2026Trial
- Trial
- Observational
- Digital tools for recruitment and retention of participants in paediatric clinical research: a scoping review.Trials · 2026Article
- Disparities in Congenital Cytomegalovirus (cCMV) Postpartum Newborn Screening Research Participation.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2025Article
- Validation of an Asthma Knowledge Tool to Assess the Efficacy of Comprehensive Asthma Education.Pediatric pulmonology · 2025Article
- Pilot Study: Improving Glycemic Control Among Children and Adolescents With Obesity and Prediabetes With Real-Time Feedback Via Continuous Glucose Monitoring.Diabetes spectrum : a publication of the American Diabetes Association · 2025Article
- Article
- Goal-directed therapeutic exercise for paediatric posterior fossa brain tumour survivors: a qualitative analysis of experiences.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024Article
- Prevalence of smoking habits, attitudes and knowledge on counteractive strategies among a sample of healthcare employees: results of the smoking-free health environments project in the province of Palermo, Italy.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the research activities of UK ophthalmologists.Eye (London, England) · 2023Article
- COVID-19 Special Collection.Journal of pediatric nursingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeMany public institutions and settings have taken action to limit exposure to and slow the spread of the novel coronavirus (COVID-19). We sought to characterize the impact of stay-at-home orders on our study of cerebral autoregulation and its association with developmental delays in infants with congenital heart disease compared with healthy controls. DESIGN AND
methodsWe calculated the number of participants recruited (i.e., not enrolled in the study) and assessed (i.e., currently enrolled) before March 2020 (pre-COVID-19) and the number of participants that we could not recruit or assess between March and July 2020 (missed due to COVID-19), separately for congenital heart disease and healthy control infants, in reference to the impacts of COVID-19. We used negative binomial regressions to determine incidence rate ratios which compared participants recruited and assessed pre-COVID-19 and missed due to COVID-19.
resultsRecruitment and assessments significantly decreased following the pandemic, i.e., participants were more likely to be recruited or be assessed pre-COVID-19 compared to during the pandemic. Study participants were 3.3 times as likely to have assessments performed pre-COVID-19 compared to during the COVID-19 pandemic (p < 0.001). CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Clinical research teams may consider making protocol modifications such as virtual visits or video recordings explaining the study, for example, to adjust to the restrictions caused by COVID-19.
conclusionThe COVID-19 pandemic drastically reduced recruitment and assessments completed in our study. Study teams will need to continue to modify procedures for recruitment and assessments that align with COVID-19 regulations to facilitate research progress during the pandemic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.