ArticleNeuroImage2021
Smooth graph learning for functional connectivity estimation.
Article in NeuroImage, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Shared and Individual Resting-State MEG Network Signatures of Tinnitus Revealed by Holistic Graph Learning.IEEE open journal of engineering in medicine and biology · 2026Article
- Graph Laplacian Learning with Exponential Family Noise.IEEE transactions on signal and information processing over networks · 2025Article
- Functional brain activity constrained by structural connectivity reveals cohort-specific features for serum neurofilament light chain.Communications medicine · 2022Article
- GraFT: Graph Filtered Temporal Dictionary Learning for Functional Neural Imaging.IEEE transactions on image processing : a publication of the IEEE Signal Processing Society · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Functional connectivity (FC) estimated from functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) signals is important in understanding neural representation and information processing in cortical networks. However, due to a lack of "ground truth" FC pattern, the reliability and robustness of FC estimates are usually examined in downstream FC analysis tasks, such as performing participant's identification (also known as "fingerprinting"). In this paper, we propose to learn FC via a smooth graph learning framework. In particular, we treat each time frame of the fMRI time series as a graph signal on an underlying functional brain graph, and estimate the smooth graph functional connectivity (SGFC) by learning the weighted graph adjacency matrix based on graph signal smoothness assumption. We demonstrate that our approach gives rise to a natural and sparse graph representation of FC from which reliable graph measures can be extracted. Reliability of SGFC is evaluated in the context of fingerprinting and compared to correlation FC (CFC). SGFC achieves higher fingerprinting accuracy across several different experiment settings; the improvement is even more significant when a shorter fMRI scanning length is used for FC estimation. In addition to being reliable, we also validate the cognitive relevance of SGFC by using it to predict fluid intelligence. Finally, in evaluating topological measures of the sparse graph, SGFC reveals a more small-world and modular structure compared to CFC. Together, our results suggest that the smooth graph learning framework produces a naturally sparse, reliable, and cognitive-relevant representation of functional connectivity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.