Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34171170›Full record

ReviewMicrobial biotechnology2021

Importance of the 5' regulatory region to bacterial synthetic biology applications.

Lisa Tietze, Rahmi Lale

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microbial biotechnology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lisa TietzePhotoSynLab, Department of Biotechnology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, N-7491, Norway.
Rahmi LalePhotoSynLab, Department of Biotechnology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, N-7491, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-5460-3163

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The field of synthetic biology is evolving at a fast pace. It is advancing beyond single-gene alterations in single hosts to the logical design of complex circuits and the development of integrated synthetic genomes. Recent breakthroughs in deep learning, which is increasingly used in de novo assembly of DNA components with predictable effects, are also aiding the discipline. Despite advances in computing, the field is still reliant on the availability of pre-characterized DNA parts, whether natural or synthetic, to regulate gene expression in bacteria and make valuable compounds. In this review, we discuss the different bacterial synthetic biology methodologies employed in the creation of 5' regulatory regions - promoters, untranslated regions and 5'-end of coding sequences. We summarize methodologies and discuss their significance for each of the functional DNA components, and highlight the key advances made in bacterial engineering by concentrating on their flaws and strengths. We end the review by outlining the issues that the discipline may face in the near future.

Indexed as

Regulatory Sequences, Nucleic AcidSynthetic BiologyBacteriaGene ExpressionPromoter Regions, Genetic

Identifiers

PMID34171170
PMCPMC8601185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.