Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34171038›Full record

ArticleForensic science international. Mind and law2020

United States drug courts and opioid agonist therapy: Missing the target of overdose reduction.

Joanne Csete

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Forensic science international. Mind and law, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joanne CseteColumbia University Mailman School of Public Health, Department of Population and Family Health, 60 Haven Avenue, B-3, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Columbia University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

•Agonist therapy for opioid use disorder (OUD) is often inaccessible in the US at a time of high overdose mortality.•OUD therapy could be offered by drug treatment courts as an alternative to criminal prosecution for some drug offenses.•Many drug courts, however, reject gold-standard agonist therapies, seeing them as "another form of addiction".•Drug courts often prefer to offer extended-release naltrexone, but it is costly and requires pre-treatment abstinence.•Drug courts have had limited success in improving access to OUD treatment at a time of high overdose mortality.

Indexed as

Drug courtsDrug overdoseDrug treatmentDrug use disordersOpioid use disorder

Identifiers

PMID34171038
PMCPMC7280826
OpenAlexW3035671929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.